King v. Lamarque

Filing 119

ORDER substituting deft Evans in place of Subia. Signed by Judge Illston on 8/31/08. (ts, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/2/2008)

Download PDF
Case 3:00-cv-01988-SI Document 118 Filed 08/29/2008 Page 1 of 2 1 MATTHEW ALGER #132853 290 SHAW AVENUE, SUITE A 2 CLOVIS, CA 93612 TEL.: (559) 324-0310 3 ATTORNEY FOR PETITIONER, 4 JAMES EDWARD KING 5 6 7 8 9 JAMES EDWARD KING, 10 Petitioner. 11 12 v. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. C 00-01988 SI STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR SUBSTITUTION OF PARTIES IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 13 RICHARD SUBIA, Warden, 14 15 16 17 Respondent. Judge: Hon. Susan Illston STIPULATION Petitioner James Edward King has been transferred to Salinas Valley State Prison and is now 18 in the custody of Michael S. Evans, the warden of that prison. It therefore is stipulated by the 19 parties, through their respective counsel, that Michael S. Evans be substituted for Richard Subia as 20 the respondent in this litigation. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO STIPULATED. Dated: August 26, 2008. /s/ Matt Alger MATTHEW ALGER Attorney for Petitioner JAMES EDWARD KING Case 3:00-cv-01988-SI Document 118 Filed 08/29/2008 Page 2 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 Dated: August , 2008. /s/ Lisa Ashley Ott LISA ASHLEY OTT DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL Attorney for Respondent RICHARD SUBIA, Warden ORDER The Parties having stipulated that Michael S. Evans, Warden, be substituted for Richard 7 Subia, Warden, as the respondent in this action, and good cause appearing therefor, 8 IT IS ORDERED that Michael S. Evans, Warden, is substituted for Richard Subia, Warden, 9 as the respondent. 10 11 12 U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ________________________________________________________________________________ King v. Subua, No. C 00-01988 SI Stipulation and Order to Substitute 2 Respondent Dated: , 2008.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?