King v. Lamarque

Filing 143

ORDER 142 (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 4/15/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 JAMES EDWARD KING, 9 10 No. C 00-1988 SI (pr) Petitioner, ORDER v. 11 12 13 MICHAEL S. EVANS, warden, Respondent. / 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 The petition for writ of habeas corpus was granted and judgment was entered in this action on April 14, 2009. Thereafter, petitioner apparently was tried and convicted again. His direct appeal is now pending in the California Court of Appeal, People v. King, Cal. Ct. App. Case No. H036078. The court has received from petitioner a letter dated April 3, 2013, with some miscellaneous attachments. (Docket # 142.) The letter came to the court in an envelope addressed to "Federal Appeal Attorney Office, U.S. District Court." In his letter, petitioner wrote that "there are a total of 11 issues in my appeal" and asked that "when the state appeals court denied (sic) my appeal, can you please represent me in federal court." Id. If petitioner wishes to challenge in federal court the conviction that occurred at his retrial, he must file a new petition for writ of habeas corpus to do so. A new case will be opened with a new case number when he files that new petition. He should not use the case number for this case, because this case is now closed. 1 Due to his appeal pending in state court, it is too early for him to file a federal habeas 2 petition. A prisoner in state custody who wishes to challenge collaterally in federal habeas 3 proceedings either the fact or length of his confinement must first exhaust state judicial 4 remedies, either on direct appeal or through collateral proceedings, by presenting the highest 5 state court available with a fair opportunity to rule on the merits of each and every claim he 6 seeks to raise in federal court. See 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254(b),(c); Rose v. Lundy, 455 U.S. 509, 515-16 7 (1982). Petitioner may file a new petition for writ of habeas corpus after he exhausts state court 8 remedies as to each claim contained in his new petition. 9 Petitioner's request for appointment of counsel to represent him in federal habeas 10 proceedings is DENIED. (Docket # 142.) The request is extremely premature. There is no 11 "federal appeal attorney office," and it is for the court to decide whether to appoint counsel to 12 represent an indigent habeas petitioner in federal court. However, the court will not consider 13 appointing counsel until there is a federal habeas petition on file. Once petitioner exhausts his 14 state court remedies, and files a new federal habeas petition to challenge his conviction upon 15 retrial, he may file a request for appointment of counsel. 16 Petitioner should not file any more documents in this action because it is closed. 17 The clerk will mail a copy of this order to petitioner as well as to the attorneys of record. 18 Petitioner's address is: James E. King, CDCR # J74101, Pleasant Valley State Prison, P.O. Box 19 8500, Coalinga, CA 93210. 20 21 IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: April 15, 2013 SUSAN ILLSTON United States District Judge 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?