Freitag v. CDC, et al

Filing 659

STIPULATION AND ORDER Granting Plaintiff's Request for Extension of Time to File Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Terminate or Alternatively to Modify the Injunction-monitoring Process re #658 : Responses due by 9/17/2012. Replies due by 9/28/2012. Motion Hearing set for 10/29/2012 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 2, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Thelton E. Henderson. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 09/10/2012. (tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/11/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

PAMELA Y. PRICE, ESQ. (STATE BAR NO. 107713)
JANE BOND MOORE, ESQ. (STATE BAR NO. 72000)
PRICE AND ASSOCIATES
A Professional Law Corporation
901 Clay Street
Oakland, CA 94607
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
JOHN L. BURRIS, ESQ. (STATE BAR NO. 69888)
Law Offices of John L. Burris
7677 Oakport Street, Suite 1120
Oakland, CA 94621
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
DEANNA L. FREITAG

11
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
14
15
16

DEANNA L. FREITAG,

17

Plaintiff,

18

v.

19

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTIONS, et al.,

20
Defendants.
21
22

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

NO. C00-2278 TEH
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER GRANTING
PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR
EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE
OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT’S
MOTION TO TERMINATE OR
ALTERNATIVELY TO MODIFY THE
INJUNCTION-MONITORING
PROCESS
HON. THELTON E. HENDERSON

23
Plaintiff DEANNA L. FREITAG and Defendant CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
24
CORRECTIONS by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate Plaintiff DEANNA
25
FREITAG may file her opposition to Defendant’s Motion To Terminate The Freitag Injunction Or,
26
Alternatively Modify the Injunction-Monitoring Process on September 17, 2012, Defendant’s reply
27
will be due on September 28 and the hearing continued to October 29, 2012 or as the Court may
28
1083P204JBM

-1STIPULATION AND ORDER (C00-2278 TEH)

1
2

order.
The parties believe that good cause exists for this second stipulation to modify the briefing

3

schedule and change the date of the hearing. Plaintiff’s attorneys, Mr. Burris and Ms. Price, have

4

been unable to consult regarding the opposition due to the illness and death of Ms. Price’s father

5

requiring her to make multiple trips to Ohio and Mr. Burris’ trial schedule. Granting the

6

stipulation will allow this consultation.

7

Dated: September 7, 2012

8

PRICE AND ASSOCIATES
/s/ Pamela Y . Price
PAMELA Y. PRICE, Attorneys for Plaintiff
DEANNA L. FREITAG

9
10
11

Dated: September 7, 2012

12

KAMALA HARRIS
Attorney General of the State of California
LYN HARLAN
Deputy Attorney General

13
/s/ Lyn Harlan
Attorneys for Defendant CALIFORNIA
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

14
15
16

ORDER

17

SO ORDERED.
S

ER

H

25

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

26
27
28
1083P204JBM

R NIA

nderson

e
on E. H

helt
Judge T

RT

24

NO

23

__________________________________
THELTON E. HENDERSON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FO

22

09/10/2012
Date: _________________

UNIT
ED

21

RT
U
O

20

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

LI

19

Pursuant to the foregoing Stipulation between the parties, and good cause appearing, IT IS

A

18

-2STIPULATION AND ORDER (C00-2278 TEH)

C