Carpenter v. Brown, et al

Filing 121

ORDER 118 SHORTENING TIME re MOTION FOR STAY OF COMPETENCY EVALUATION PENDING APPEAL. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on September 5, 2008. (mmcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/5/2008)

Download PDF
1 MICHAEL M. CRAIN State Bar No. 45083 2 P. O. Box 3730 Santa Monica, California 90408 3 Telephone 310-571-3324 Fax 310-626-9983 4 E-mail: Michaelmcrain@aol.com 5 ROBERT D. BACON State Bar No. 73297 6 484 Lake Park Avenue, PMB 110 Oakland, California 94610 7 Telephone 510-834-6219 Fax 510-444-6861 8 E-mail: bacon2254@aol.com 9 Attorneys for Petitioner Carpenter 10 11 12 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO ) ) ) Petitioner, ) ) vs. ) ) ROBERT L. AYERS, Jr., Warden ) of San Quentin State Prison, ) ) Respondent. ) ___________________________________ ) 14 DAVID J. CARPENTER, 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 No. C 98-2444 MMC No. C 00-3706 MMC DEATH PENALTY CASES [PROPOSED] ORDER SHORTENING TIME re MOTION FOR STAY OF COMPETENCY EVALUATION PENDING APPEAL On unopposed motion of Petitioner, and good cause appearing, IT IS ORDERED: The motion to shorten time is granted with respect to the Petitioner's motion for stay of competency evaluation pending appeal. Respondent may serve and file a response to the motion for stay of competency 9 evaluation pending appeal by _____ m., September ___, 2008. Petitioner may serve and file a reply in support of the motion for stay of competency 11 evaluation pending appeal by ____ m., September ____, 2008. Order Shortening Time No. C 98-2444 MMC & C 00-3706 MMC 1 1 2 hearing. 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 The Court may determine the motion for stay on the written papers without an oral 5 Signed September ___, 2008. _____________________________________________ MAXINE M. CHESNEY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Order Shortening Time No. C 98-2444 MMC & C 00-3706 MMC 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?