Allen, et al v. City of Oakland, et al

Filing 1017

ORDER approving Compliance Director staff (Edward Swanson). Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 08/20/14. (tehlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/20/2014)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 DELPHINE ALLEN, et al., Plaintiffs, 5 6 7 8 v. CITY OF OAKLAND, et al., Case No. 00-cv-04599-TEH ORDER APPROVING COMPLIANCE DIRECTOR STAFF (EDWARD SWANSON) Defendants. 9 10 The Court approves the engagement of Edward Swanson, Esq., of Swanson and United States District Court Northern District of California 11 McNamara, LLP, to assist the Compliance Director with the investigation ordered by the 12 Court on August 14, 2014. Mr. Swanson will have the same rights and privileges as the 13 Compliance Director, including those relating to access to information and personnel, 14 confidentiality, and testifying in this or other matters. He shall not use any information 15 gained during the scope of this engagement in any capacity aside from his role as part of 16 the Compliance Director’s team. In addition, he shall not be retained by any current or 17 future litigant or claimant in a suit or claim against the City or its employees. 18 Mr. Swanson shall be paid by Defendants through the Court registry. Defendants 19 shall therefore deposit $25,000 into the Court registry on or before September 10, 2014. 20 Within twenty-one days of the entry of each order approving payment to Mr. Swanson, the 21 City shall deposit the full amount paid by the order so that the funds on deposit are 22 replenished to $25,000. When Mr. Swanson’s services have ended, the Clerk will disburse 23 to the City the balance of funds on deposit in the registry, including any earned interest. 24 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 27 28 Dated: 08/20/14 _ THELTON E. HENDERSON United States District Judge ________

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?