Allen, et al v. City of Oakland, et al
Filing
686
STIPULATION AND ORDER Re Briefing and Hearing Dates for Receivership Proceedings re 684 : Motions due by 10/4/2012. Responses due by 11/8/2012. Replies due by 11/29/2012. Motion Hearing set for 12/13/2012 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 2, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Thelton E. Henderson. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 02/23/2012. (tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/24/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
JOHN L. BURRIS, STATE BAR NO. 69888
Law Offices of John L. Burris
Airport Corporate Centre
7677 Oakport Road, Suite 1120
Oakland, California 94621
Telephone: 510.839.5200
Facsimile:
510.839.3882
8
JAMES B. CHANIN, STATE BAR NO. 76043
JULIE M. HOUK, STATE BAR NO. 114968
Law Offices of James B. Chanin
3050 Shattuck Avenue
Berkeley, California 94705
Telephone: 510.848.4752, Ex. 2
Facsimile:
510.848.5819
9
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
6
7
10
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
13
14
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
DELPHINE ALLEN, et al.,
15
16
Plaintiffs,
vs.
17
18
19
20
CITY OF OAKLAND, et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: C00-4599 TEH
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER RE: BRIEFING AND HEARING
DATES FOR RECEIVERSHIP
PROCEEDINGS
21
22
WHEREAS, in its January 24, 2012 Order Vacating the January 26, 2012 Status
23
Conference and Conferring Additional Authority on Monitor, the Court Ordered the parties to
24
meet and confer and to propose a briefing and hearing schedule for receivership proceedings; and
25
WHEREAS, the counsel for the parties have met and conferred per the Court's Order, and
26
Stipulation and Order re Receivership Briefing and Hearing Schedule
Delphine Allen v. City of Oakland, et al., Case No. C00-4599 TEH
1
THE PARTIES, BY AND THROUGH THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD, DO HEREBY
1
2
STIPULATE, AGREE AND REQUEST THAT the Court set the following briefing and hearing
3
schedule for the Court to hear plaintiff's motion to initiate receivership proceedings in this
4
action:
5
6
7
1. Plaintiffs' Opening Papers To be Filed: October 4, 2012;
2. Defendants' Opposition To Be Filed: November 8, 2012;
3. Plaintiffs' Reply To Be Filed: November 29, 2012
8
9
10
2,
4. Hearing Date: December 13, 2012. at 10:00 a.m.
THE PARTIES FURTHER AGREE, STIPULATE AND REQUEST THAT in the event
11
the Monitor issues additional reports after the aforementioned deadlines and prior to the hearing
12
date, the parties may supplement their filings to include additional information as needed. The
13
parties reserve their right to request an evidentiary hearing as part of the record on this matter.
14
The OPOA, as intervener, retains the right to file responsive pleadings and make appearances in
15
this matter.
16
17
18
IT IS SO STIPULATED:
19
20
Dated: February 22, 2012
_______/S/_________________________
John L. Burris
Attorney for Plaintiffs
Dated: February 22, 2012
_______/S/_________________________
James B. Chanin
Attorney for Plaintiffs
Dated: February 22, 2012
_______/S/_________________________
Gregory M. Fox
Attorney for Defendant
21
22
23
24
25
26
Stipulation and Order re Receivership Briefing and Hearing Schedule
Delphine Allen v. City of Oakland, et al., Case No. C00-4599 TEH
2
_________/S/_______________________
Rocio V. Fierro
Attorney for Defendant
Dated: February 22, 2012
________/S/________________________
Rockne A. Lucia
Attorney for the OPOA
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
2
4
ER
H
11
. He
helton E
Judge T
RT
10
nderson
NO
9
________________________________
Thelton E. Henderson
Judge of the United States District Court
R NIA
8
02/23
Dated: ____________, 2012
FO
7
S
6
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION,
IT IS SO ORDERED:
UNIT
ED
5
LI
3
RT
U
O
Dated: February 22, 2012
A
1
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
Stipulation and Order re Receivership Briefing and Hearing Schedule
Delphine Allen v. City of Oakland, et al., Case No. C00-4599 TEH
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?