Allen, et al v. City of Oakland, et al

Filing 713

ORDER re: limited nature of intervention by Oakland Police Officers' Association. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 08/27/12. (tehlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/27/2012)

Download PDF
1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 5 DELPHINE ALLEN, et al., 6 7 8 MASTER CASE FILE NO. C00-4599 TEH Plaintiffs, ORDER RE: LIMITED NATURE OF INTERVENTION BY OAKLAND POLICE OFFICERS’ ASSOCIATION v. CITY OF OAKLAND, et al., 9 Defendants. 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 It has come to the Court’s attention that Intervenor Oakland Police Officers’ 12 Association (“OPOA”) has asserted that it has a right to participate in all proceedings, 13 including meetings conducted by the Monitor, concerning the Negotiated Settlement 14 Agreement (“NSA”). The OPOA has no such right. To the contrary, the OPOA was 15 “permitted to intervene for the limited purpose of addressing Section XV C of the Settlement 16 agreement entered on January 22, 2003 by the Court.” Apr. 23, 2003 Stip. & Order for the 17 Limited Intervention of the OPOA at 3 (Docket No. 194) (emphasis added). Section XV.C 18 of the NSA concerns the interplay between the NSA and collective bargaining agreements, 19 and the OPOA has no right to participate in meetings or other proceedings, or portions 20 thereof, where other NSA-related issues are discussed. 21 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. 23 24 Dated: 08/27/12 25 26 27 28 THELTON E. HENDERSON, JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?