Nursing Home Pension Fund et al v. Oracle Corporation et al

Filing 1611

ORDER RE: PARTIES' RECENT FILINGS. Granting 1602 , denying 1607 . (SI, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/6/2009)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: March 6, 2009 SUSAN ILLSTON United States District Judge IT IS SO ORDERED. NURSING HOME PENSION FUND, et al., v. Plaintiffs, No. C 01-00988 SI ORDER RE: PARTIES' RECENT FILINGS IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ORACLE CORPORATION, et al., Defendants. /

On February 13, 2009, the Court heard oral argument on the parties' cross-motions for summary judgment. On February 22, plaintiffs moved to submit a recently decided Ninth Circuit case. Defendants opposed the motion. Plaintiffs moved for leave to file a reply to defendants' opposition. [Docket No. 1607] Defendants opposed that motion as well. Plaintiffs' February 22 motion [Docket No. 1602] is GRANTED insofar as it provides notice of the Ninth Circuit's decision in Huberman v. Tag-It Pacific Inc., No. 07-55648 (9th Cir. Jan. 16, 2009). Plaintiff's motion for leave to file a reply [Docket No. 1607] is DENIED. The Court will not consider any argument submitted by the parties in any of these motions. Going forward, neither party may submit argument in conjunction with notices of recent authority.