Plata et al v. Schwarzenegger et al
Filing
2405
STIPULATION AND ORDER for Collection of Undisputed Attorney' Fees and Costs for 2010. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 10/11/2011. (tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/11/2011)
1
2
3
4
PRISON LAW OFFICE
DONALD SPECTER #83925
STEVEN FAMA #99641
ALISON HARDY #135966
1917 Fifth Street
Berkeley, CA 94710
Telephone: (510) 280-2621
ahardy@prisonlaw.com
BINGHAM McCUTCHEN
WARREN E. GEORGE #53588
Three Embarcadero Center
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: (415) 393-2000
Facsimile: (415) 393-2286
5
6
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
7
8
9
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12
13
MARCIANO PLATA, et al.,
14
Plaintiffs,
15
v.
16
No. C-01-1351 T.E.H.
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR
COLLECTION OF UNDISPUTED
ATTORNEYS' FEES AND COSTS
FOR 2010
ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, et al.,
17
18
19
Defendants.
On December 17, 2002, this Court established a procedure by which plaintiffs are
20
to collect attorneys' fees and costs incurred in connection with the Stipulation for
21
Injunctive Relief. This procedure requires plaintiffs' counsel to submit to defendants a
22
quarterly statement of fees incurred in monitoring work, and permits defendants thirty (30)
23
days from the receipt of plaintiffs' statement to notify plaintiffs of any disputed items.
24
After the parties meet and confer on any of defendant's objections, counsel shall then
25
prepare a stipulated order for payment of the fees not subject to defendants’ objections.
26
The Order also states that defendants shall have thirty (30) days from the entry of the order
27
to pay the undisputed fees and that interest on any undisputed fees will run from the thirty-
28
Stipulation and Order Re: Collection of 2010 Fees
Plata v. Schwarzenegger, No. C-01-1351 T.E.H.
1
first day after the Order is filed, accruing at the rate provided by 28 U.S.C. § 1961.
2
Pursuant to this procedure, plaintiffs' counsel served their fourth quarter billing
3
statement for the period October 1, 2010 through December 31, 2010 on March 31, 2010.
4
Following a meet and confer, the parties agreed to payment of $221,315 in undisputed fees
5
for the fourth quarter. The attorney market rates referenced in this proposed revision are
6
those contained in Plaintiff's adjusted 2010 billing spreadsheets, and those rates will be for
7
the purposes of calendar year 2010 billings in this matter only.
8
Additionally, the parties had disputed the hourly rate due for the services of
9
litigation assistants during the first through the third quarters of 2010. Following a
10
subsequent meet and confer, however, the parties agreed that defendants would pay an
11
additional $154,232, based on the hourly rate for litigation assistants of $180.
12
WHEREFORE, defendants agree to pay plaintiffs’ counsel $375,547 within 30
13
days of the signing of this Order. On the 31st day following the entry of this Order, interest
14
on any unpaid amount will begin to accrue at the rate provided by 28 U.S.C. § 1961 (i.e.,
15
the weekly average 1 year constant maturity Treasury yield for the calendar week
16
preceding the date of the Order.)
17
AGREED TO BY THE PARTIES:
18
Date: September 21, 2011
/s/
Alison Hardy
Attorney for Plaintiffs
19
20
21
Date: September 21, 2011
/s/
Kyle A. Lewis
Supervising Deputy Attorney General
Attorney for Defendants
22
23
24
25
I, Alison Hardy, attest that Kyle Lewis signed this document on September 21,
2011.
26
27
28
Stipulation and Order Re: Collection of 2010 Fees
Plata v. Schwarzenegger, No. C-01-1351 T.E.H.
2
S
UNIT
ED
IT IS SO ORDERED.
10/11
Date: _______________, 2011
NO
5
. Hend
helton E
Judge T
RT
4
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Stipulation and Order Re: Collection of 2010 Fees
Plata v. Schwarzenegger, No. C-01-1351 T.E.H.
3
A
H
ER
FO
3
R NIA
___________________________
Honorable Thelton E. Henderson
United States District CourtnJudge
erso
LI
2
RT
U
O
1
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?