Dukes et al v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Filing 1047

Order by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley RE: JOINT DISCOVERY LETTER BRIEF # 1041 .(jsclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/3/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 BETTY DUKES, et al., Case No. 01-cv-02252-CRB (JSC) Plaintiffs, 8 v. ORDER RE: JOINT DISCOVERY LETTER BRIEF 9 10 WAL-MART STORES, INC., Re: Dkt. No. 1041 Defendant. United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 The parties have filed a Joint Discovery Letter Brief regarding a Rule 30(b)(6) deposition 14 previously noticed by Plaintiffs. (Dkt. No. 1041.) The Court heard argument regarding the matter 15 on February 3, 2015. Defendant has agreed to produce a designee knowledgeable regarding male 16 comparators in the same job position at the same store and at the same time as the Plaintiffs. With 17 respect to comparators from a larger pool of those in the same pay grade, for the reasons stated on 18 the record, Plaintiffs shall identify by employee id number a proposed list of comparators for each 19 plaintiff. The parties shall then meet and confer regarding Plaintiffs’ proposed list. To the extent 20 the parties are unable to resolve the matter through a good faith meet and confer, the parties may 21 contact Courtroom Deputy Ada Means to arrange for a further telephonic discovery hearing 22 regarding the matter and each party may submit letter briefs outlining their respective positions. 23 This Order disposes of Docket No. 1041. 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: February 3, 2015 ______________________________________ JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?