Dukes et al v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Filing
1047
Order by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley RE: JOINT DISCOVERY LETTER BRIEF # 1041 .(jsclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/3/2015)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
BETTY DUKES, et al.,
Case No. 01-cv-02252-CRB (JSC)
Plaintiffs,
8
v.
ORDER RE: JOINT DISCOVERY
LETTER BRIEF
9
10
WAL-MART STORES, INC.,
Re: Dkt. No. 1041
Defendant.
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
The parties have filed a Joint Discovery Letter Brief regarding a Rule 30(b)(6) deposition
14
previously noticed by Plaintiffs. (Dkt. No. 1041.) The Court heard argument regarding the matter
15
on February 3, 2015. Defendant has agreed to produce a designee knowledgeable regarding male
16
comparators in the same job position at the same store and at the same time as the Plaintiffs. With
17
respect to comparators from a larger pool of those in the same pay grade, for the reasons stated on
18
the record, Plaintiffs shall identify by employee id number a proposed list of comparators for each
19
plaintiff. The parties shall then meet and confer regarding Plaintiffs’ proposed list. To the extent
20
the parties are unable to resolve the matter through a good faith meet and confer, the parties may
21
contact Courtroom Deputy Ada Means to arrange for a further telephonic discovery hearing
22
regarding the matter and each party may submit letter briefs outlining their respective positions.
23
This Order disposes of Docket No. 1041.
24
25
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: February 3, 2015
______________________________________
JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?