Dukes et al v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Filing 723

STIPULATION AND ORDER to shorten time to consider joint motion to extend stay. Signed by Judge Vaughn R. Walker on 09/17/10. (rbe, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/17/2010)

Download PDF
Dukes et al v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. Doc. 723 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP BRAD SELIGMAN (SBN 083838) JOCELYN D. LARKIN (SBN 110817) THE IMPACT FUND 125 University Avenue, Suite 102 Berkeley, CA 94710 Telephone: (510) 845-3473 Facsimile: (510) 845-3654 BSeligman@impactfund.org, jlarkin@impactfund.org JOSEPH M. SELLERS (pro hac vice) COHEN, MILSTEIN, SELLERS & TOLL, PLLC 1100 New York Ave., #500 Washington, D.C. 20005 JSellers@cohenmilstein.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs , THEODORE J. BOUTROUS, JR. (SBN 132099) THEANE EVANGELIS KAPUR (SBN 243570) GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 333 South Grand Avenue Los Angeles, California 90071 Telephone: (213) 229-7000 Facsimile: (213) 229-7520 TBoutrous@gibsondunn.com, TKapur@gibsondunn.com, MARK A. PERRY (SBN 212532) RACHEL S. BRASS (SBN 219301) GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 555 Mission Street, Suite 3000 San Francisco, California 94105 Telephone: (415) 393-8200 Facsimile: (415) 393-8306 MPerry@gibsondunn.com, RBrass@gibsondunn.com Attorneys for Defendant UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA BETTY DUKES, PATRICIA SURGESON, CLEO PAGE, DEBORAH GUNTER, KAREN WILLIAMSON, CHRISTINE KWAPNOSKI, AND EDITH ARANA on behalf of themselves, and on behalf of all other similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. WAL-MART STORES, INC., Defendant. CASE NO. C 01-2252 VRW (EMC) STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO SHORTEN TIME TO CONSIDER JOINT MOTION TO EXTEND STAY 1 STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO SHORTEN TIME, CASE NO. C 01-2252 VRW (EMC) Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP WHEREAS, on May 14, 2010, the Court stayed all proceedings in this matter until the earlier of 30 days after the Supreme Court's ruling on Wal-Mart's petition for a writ of certiorari or September 30, 2010; WHEREAS, Wal-Mart filed a petition for a writ of certiorari in this matter on August 25, 2010; WHEREAS, the parties currently anticipate that the certiorari-stage briefing will be completed by November 5, 2010; WHEREAS, Civil Local Rule 7-2(a) requires that a motion be noticed for a date not less than 35 days after service of the motion; WHEREAS, the Court's stay is currently due to expire 14 days from today; and WHEREAS, the issues presented in the petition for a writ of certiorari will have a direct impact on the issues in this proceeding; Counsel stipulate and agree to shorten the time for hearing on the concurrently filed Joint Motion to Extend Stay of All Proceedings Pending Supreme Court Review so that this joint motion may be heard on or before September 30, 2010, the day the currently-imposed stay is due to expire. DATED: September 16, 2010 THE IMPACT FUND BRAD SELIGMAN COHEN MILSTEIN, SELLERS & TOLL PLLC JOSEPH M. SELLERS By:/s/ Brad Seligman Brad Seligman Attorneys for Plaintiffs 2 STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO SHORTEN TIME, CASE NO. C 01-2252 VRW (EMC) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP DATED: September 16, 2010 GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP THEODORE J. BOUTROUS, JR. MARK A. PERRY RACHEL S. BRASS By:/s/ Theodore J. Boutrous, Jr. Theodore J. Boutrous, Jr. Attorneys for Defendant WAL-MART STORES, INC. I, Theodore J. Boutrous, Jr. attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the other signatories. PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. Chief Judge Vaughn R. Walker UNIT ED Sept. 17th Dated the _______ of _________, 2010 S S DISTRICT TE C TA 100937210_1 (Stipulation to Shorten Time).DOC ER N F D IS T IC T O R 3 STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO SHORTEN TIME, CASE NO. C 01-2252 VRW (EMC) A C LI alker ghn R W au Judge V FO R NIA RT U O NO RT H

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?