Dukes et al v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Filing 801

STIPULATION AND ORDER Regarding Advancement of Hearing Date for Wal-Mart's Motion to Dismiss Fourth Amended Complaint. # 781 MOTION to Dismiss Hearing set for 6/8/2012 10:00 AM in Courtroom 6, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Charles R. Breyer. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 04/18/2012. (tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/18/2012)

1

Joseph M. Sellers (pro hac vice)
Christine E. Webber (pro hac vice)
Jenny R. Yang (pro hac vice)
Peter Romer-Friedman (pro hac vice)
COHEN MILSTEIN SELLERS & TOLL PLLC
West Tower, Suite 500
1100 New York Avenue
Washington, DC 20005
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 202.408.4699
[e-mail]

5

Brad Seligman (SBN 083838)
Jocelyn D. Larkin (SBN 110817)
THE IMPACT FUND
125 University Avenue
Berkeley, CA 94710
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 510.845.3654
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

6

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

7

Theodore J. Boutrous, Jr. (SBN 132099)
GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
333 South Grand Avenue
Los Angeles, CA 90071
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 213.229.7520
[e-mail]

2
3
4

8
9
10
11

Attorneys for Defendant

12

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

13

NORTHERNDISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

14
15
16
17

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
BETTY DUKES, PATRICIA SURGESON,
EDITH ARANA, DEBORAH GUNTER and
CHRISTINE KWAPNOSKI, on behalf of
themselves and all others similarly situated,

20
21

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER REGARDING ADVANCEMENT
OF HEARING DATE FOR WAL-MART’S
MOTION TO DISMISS FOURTH
AMENDED COMPLAINT

Plaintiffs,

18
19

CASE NO.:C 01-2252-CRB

v.
WAL-MART STORES, INC.,
Defendant.

22
23

The undersigned counsel, on behalf of Betty Dukes, Patricia Surgeson, Edith Arana, Deborah

24

Gunter, and Christine Kwapnoski (“Named Plaintiffs”) and Defendant Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (“Wal-

25

Mart”), hereby stipulate and agree as follows:

26
27
28

WHEREAS, on January 13, 2012, Wal-Mart filed its Motion to Dismiss the Fourth Amended
Complaint and noticed a hearing on the motion for May 11, 2012, see Dkt. 781;
WHEREAS, on March 23, 2012, this Court advanced the hearing date from May 11, 2012 to
1
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING ADVANCEMENT OF HEARING DATE FOR WAL-MART’S MOTION TO
DISMISS FOURTH AMENDED COMPLAINT
CASE NO.: C 01-2252-CRB

1

May 7, 2012, see Dkt. 788;

2
3

WHEREAS, on April 10, 2012, this Court continued the hearing date from May 7, 2012 to
June 22, 2012, see Dkt. 794;

4

WHEREAS, counsel for Named Plaintiffs are unavailable on June 22, 2012;

5

WHEREAS, the Office of the Calendar Clerk has advised counsel that the Court may be

6

available to hear Wal-Mart’s Motion to Dismiss the Fourth Amended Complaint on June 8, 2012;

7
8

WHEREAS, counsel for Named Plaintiffs and counsel for Wal-Mart are available on June 8,
2012 to be heard on Wal-Mart’s Motion to Dismiss the Fourth Amended Complaint;

9
10

WHEREAS, all briefing on Wal-Mart’s Motion to Dismiss the Fourth Amended Complaint
has been submitted to the Court;

11
12

THEREFORE, Named Plaintiffs and Wal-Mart stipulate and agree that the hearing date on
Wal-Mart’s Motion to Dismiss the Fourth Amended Complaint be advanced to June 8, 2012.

13
14

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

15
16

Dated: April 17, 2012

17

By:

18

21

Joseph M. Sellers (pro hac vice)
COHEN MILSTEIN SELLERS & TOLL PLLC
West Tower, 100 New York Avenue, Suite 500
1100 New York Avenue
Washington, D.C. 20005
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 510.845.3654

22

Attorneys for Named Plaintiffs

23

I, Joseph M. Sellers, attest that concurrence
in the filing of this document has been obtained
from the other signatory.

19
20

/s/ Joseph M. Sellers

_

/s/ Theodore S. Boutrous, Jr.

By:

Theodore J. Boutrous, Jr. (SBN 132099)
GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
333 South Grand Avenue
Los Angeles, CA 90071
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 213.229.7520
Attorneys for Defendant

S

____________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICTeyer
JUDGE
r
CHARLES R. BREYER s R. B
Charle
Judge
2
RT

FO

NO

28

04/18/2012
DATE: _______________

LI

27

R NIA

26

UNIT
ED

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED

RT
U
O

25

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

H

ER
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING ADVANCEMENT OF HEARING DATE FOR WAL-MART’S MOTION TO
C
N
F
DISMISS FOURTH AMENDED COMPLAINT
D IS T IC T O
R
CASE NO.: C 01-2252-CRB
A

24