Dukes et al v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
ORDER REQUIRING RESPONSE BY PLAINTIFFS. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 12/13/2012. (crblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/13/2012)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
No. C 01-02252 CRB
DUKES, ET AL.,
ORDER REQUIRING RESPONSE
WAL-MART STORES, INC.,
Defendant Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (“Wal-Mart”) has moved for leave to file a motion
for reconsideration (dkt. 822) of this Court’s order denying Wal-Mart’s Motion to Dismiss.
Specifically, Wal-Mart asks this Court to reconsider whether, for purposes of exhausting
their administrative remedies, absent class members may rely on the administrative charge
filed by former named plaintiff Stephanie Odle.
The Court ORDERS Plaintiffs to respond to Wal-Mart’s motion. In a filing of no
more than 12 pages, Plaintiffs shall address both whether leave should be granted to file the
motion as well as the merits of the proposed motion for reconsideration. Plaintiffs’ response
shall be submitted no later than 5:00 p.m. on December 27, 2012.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: December 13, 2012
G:\CRBALL\2001\2252\order requiring response.wpd
CHARLES R. BREYER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?