Al-Zaghari et al v. Al-Zaghari et al

Filing 17

ORDER by Judge Marilyn Hall Patel denying 16 Motion for Leave to File motion vacating vexatious lititgant order (Attachments: # 1 CertServ) (awb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/5/2009)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Plaintiffs have filed a motion for leave to file a motion vacating the vexatious litigant order in this action. An order was entered on August 15, 2001 ordering pre-filing review. Despite that order plaintiffs have filed or attempted to file over forty (40) actions in this court. All, except five or six appeals from the bankruptcy court, have involved the same issues having to do with family law matters heard and resolved in the state court. Plaintiff Shirley Remmert has filed or attempted to file numerous actions on her own behalf, on behalf of her daughter who is under a conservatorship and on behalf of her minor grandson related to custody issues. This court has repeatedly advised plaintiff to cease filing actions in this court over which this court has no jurisdiction and which merely are other versions of the same complaints that have been previously dismissed or were barred by the pre-filing review order. This latest filing is an apparent attempt to revive all of those claims in an omnibus complaint against a myriad of defendants plaintiffs have already sued or attempted to sue, e.g., other members of the al-Zaghari family, various state and local courts and county officials, to name only a few. vs. REJA AL-ZAGHARI, et al., Defendant(s). / A.A.(Minor), EVA AL-ZAGHARI, SHIRLEY V. REMMERT, Plaintiff(s), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA No. C 01-2870 MHP ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR LEAVE

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Plaintiff Shirley V. Remmert has abused the court system and has by her conduct since the filing of the pre-filing review order demonstrated that she truly is a vexatious litigant. Therefore, the motion for leave to file a motion to vacate the pre-filing review order is DENIED. The Clerk of Court shall not file the motion and other accompanying papers.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Date: May 4, 2009

MARILYN HALL PATEL Judge, United States District Court Northern District of California

2

United States District Court For the Northern District of California 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10

28 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2

27

26

25

24

1

ENDNOTES

3