Securities And Exchange Commission v. Lapine
Filing
92
REQUEST FOR RESPONSE. Signed by Judge Alsup on January 8, 2010. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/8/2010)
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 v. CHARLES McCALL, Defendant. / v. JAY LAPINE, Defendant. / SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, No. C 01-03650 WHA Consolidated with: No. C 03-02603 WHA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
REQUEST FOR RESPONSE
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff,
In light of the acquittal of defendant Jay Lapine in United States v. McCall, et al., No. CR 00-0505 WHA, the SEC was ordered to show cause why the above-captioned action against defendant Lapine should not be dismissed. The Court is in receipt of the SEC's submission addressing the evidence upon which it intends to rely at trial. Defendant Lapine is ordered to respond in writing to the SEC's submission on or before NOON ON JANUARY 19, 2010. Defendant Lapine's response should be no more than 25 pages. Any reply by the SEC
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
should be no more than 12 pages and must be received on or before NOON ON JANUARY 22, 2010.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: January 8, 2010.
WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
