Securities And Exchange Commission v. Lapine

Filing 97

ORDER RE REQUEST TO ENLARGE TIME. Signed by Judge Alsup on February 1, 2010. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/1/2010)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. JAY LAPINE, Defendant. / FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

No. C 01-03650 WHA Consolidated with: No. C 03-02603 WHA

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. CHARLES McCALL, Defendant. /

ORDER RE REQUEST TO ENLARGE TIME

The SEC and defendant Jay Lapine have filed a stipulated request to modify discovery and filing deadlines in this matter on the grounds that they have reached a settlement agreement "in principle, subject to approval by members of the Commission" (Br. at 2). The parties must clarify whether their settlement agreement has been actually finalized but for the Commission's approval. If the details of the settlement agreement have not yet been finalized

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

and submitted to the Commission for approval, good cause to modify the case schedule has not been shown.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 1, 2010.

WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2