Boston Scientific Corporation et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al

Filing 840

ORDER by Judge Illston granting 839 Motion for Leave to File Surreply (ts, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/6/2008)

Boston Scientific Corporation et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al

Doc. 840

Case 3:02-cv-00790-SI

Document 839

Filed 02/04/2008

Page 1 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

Robert B. Morrill, <[e-mail]> (SBN 035488) Teague I. Donahey, <[e-mail]> (SBN 197531) SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP 555 California Street, Suite 2000 San Francisco, California 94104 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] David T. Pritikin, <[e-mail]> (pro hac vice) William H. Baumgartner, Jr. <[e-mail]> (pro hac vice) SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP 1 S. Dearborn Street Chicago, Illinois 60603 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Defendants Johnson & Johnson and Cordis Corporation UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION BSC CORPORATION, BSC SCIMED, INC., SCIMED LIFE SYSTEMS, INC., and SCHNEIDER (EUROPE) GmbH, Plaintiffs, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. C 02-790 SI (filed Feb. 14, 2002) J&J/CORDIS'S MOTION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF TO FILE A SURREPLY TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC'S REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF ITS RENEWED MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW OF NONINFRINGEMENT OF THE FONTIRROCHE PATENT

16 vs. 17 18 19 20 21 CORDIS CORPORATION, 22 Counterclaim-Plaintiff, 23 vs. 24 25 26 Counterclaim-Defendants. 27 28 BSC CORPORATION, BSC SCIMED, INC., SCIMED LIFE SYSTEMS, INC., and SCHNEIDER (EUROPE) GmbH, JOHNSON & JOHNSON and CORDIS CORPORATION, Defendants.

Date: Friday, Feb. 15, 2008 Time: 9:00 a.m. Place: Courtroom 10, 19th floor

J&J/CORDIS'S MOTION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF TO FILE A SURREPLY TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC'S REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF ITS RENEWED MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW OF NONINFRINGEMENT OF THE FONTIRROCHE PATENT/ No. C 02-790 SI
Dockets.Justia.com

Case 3:02-cv-00790-SI

Document 839

Filed 02/04/2008

Page 2 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

Pursuant to LR 7-11 and 7-3(d), Cordis Corporation respectfully requests leave to file the attached surreply brief (Exhibit A) to address an argument that was first made by BSC in reply (relating to whether Cordis's equivalents theory was disclosed before trial in its final infringement contentions). Dated: February 4, 2008 By: /s/ David T. Pritikin Robert B. Morrill (SBN 035488) Teague I. Donahey (SBN 197531) SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP 555 California Street, Suite 2000 San Francisco, California 94104 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] David T. Pritikin (pro hac vice) William H. Baumgartner, Jr. (pro hac vice) SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP One South Dearborn Street Chicago, Illinois 60603 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] JOHNSON & JOHNSON and CORDIS CORPORATION Eric I. Harris (Of Counsel) One Johnson & Johnson Plaza New Brunswick, New Jersey 08933 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Defendants Johnson & Johnson and Cordis Corporation

IT IS SO ORDERED. 21 22 Dated: February ___, 2008 23 24 25 26 27 28
J&J/CORDIS'S MOTION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF TO FILE A SURREPLY TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC'S REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF ITS RENEWED MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW OF NONINFRINGEMENT OF THE FONTIRROCHE PATENT/ No. C 02-790 SI

_______________________________________ SUSAN ILLSTON United States District Judge