Boston Scientific Corporation et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al

Filing 907

ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE. All parties to bear their own attorneys' fees and costs. (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/15/2009)

Download PDF
Case3:02-cv-00790-SI Document906 Filed10/09/09 Page1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 William F. Lee (admitted in N.D. Cal.) Dominic E. Massa (admitted pro hac vice) WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR LLP 60 State Street Boston, Massachusetts 02109 Telephone: (617) 526-6000 Facsimile: (617) 526-5000 Mark D. Selwyn (SBN 244180) Nathan L. Walker (SBN 206128) Christine Duh (SBN 228544) WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR LLP 1117 California Avenue Palo Alto, California 94304 Telephone: (650) 858-6000 Facsimile: (650) 858-6100 Attorneys for Plaintiffs-Counterclaim Defendants, BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION, BOSTON SCIENTIFIC SCIMED, INC., SCIMED LIFE SYSTEMS, INC., and SCHNEIDER (EUROPE) GmbH UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION Civil Action No. 02-0790 SI 15 BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION, BOSTON SCIENTIFIC SCIMED, INC., 16 SCIMED LIFE SYSTEMS, INC. and SCHNEIDER (EUROPE) GmbH, 17 Plaintiffs, 18 v. 19 JOHNSON & JOHNSON and CORDIS CORPORATION, 20 Defendants. 21 CORDIS CORPORATION 22 Counterclaim Plaintiff, v. 23 24 BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION, BOSTON SCIENTIFIC SCIMED, INC., 25 SCIMED LIFE SYSTEMS, INC. and SCHNEIDER (EUROPE) GmbH, 26 Counterclaim Defendants. 27 28 1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE Case3:02-cv-00790-SI Document906 Filed10/09/09 Page2 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the parties hereby move for an order dismissing all claims and counterclaims in this action, with prejudice, with each party to bear its own costs, expenses and attorneys' fees. Dated: October 8, 2009 WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR LLP By: /s/ Mark D. Selwyn Mark D. Selwyn Attorneys for Plaintiffs-Counterclaim Defendants Dated: October 8, 2009 SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP By: /s/ Theodore W. Chandler Theodore W. Chandler Attorneys for DefendantsCounterclaim Plaintiffs 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE Case3:02-cv-00790-SI Document906 Filed10/09/09 Page3 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, this matter is hereby dismissed with prejudice, with all parties to bear their own attorneys' fees and costs. IT IS SO ORDERED. Honorable Susan Illston JUDGE OF THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT 3 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?