Center for Biological Diversity v. Whitman et al

Filing 273

STIPULATED SETTLEMENT AND ORDER. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 11/4/13. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/4/2013)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, ) Case No. 3:11-cv-5108-JSW ) Case No. 3:02-cv-1580-JSW (related case) Plaintiff, ) ) ) v. ) ) STIPULATED SETTLEMENT AND UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE; DAN ASHE, in his official capacity ) [PROPOSED] ORDER ) as Director of the Fish and Wildlife Service; ) UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL ) PROTECTION AGENCY; and ROBERT PERCIASEPE, in his official capacity as Acting ) ) Administrator of EPA, ) ) Defendants, ) CROP LIFE AMERICA; ) ) Defendant-Intervenor. ) 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Stipulated Settlement and [Proposed] Order Case No. 3:11-cv-5108-JSW 1 Plaintiff Center for Biological Diversity (“the Center”), the United States Fish and 2 Wildlife Service (the “Service”), Dan Ashe, in his official capacity as Director of the Fish and 3 Wildlife Service, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”), and Robert 4 Perciasepe, in his official capacity as Acting Administrator of EPA,1 (collectively “the Parties”) 5 by and through the undersigned counsel, state as follows: 6 7 WHEREAS, the EPA determined that 64 pesticides “may affect” the California redlegged frog (Rana draytonii), which is a federally protected species under the ESA; 8 9 WHEREAS, the EPA requested formal consultation on the frog with the Service for these pesticides but the agencies have not yet completed these consultations; 10 WHEREAS, the Center filed a complaint on October 19, 2011, alleging that the Service 11 and the EPA have violated Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act (“ESA”), the ESA’s 12 implementing regulations, and the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”), with regard to the 13 alleged failure to complete consultation and the potential impacts of these 64 pesticide 14 ingredients upon the California red-legged frog; 15 WHEREAS, the Center and the Federal Defendants, through their authorized 16 representatives, have reached agreement on the terms of a settlement, which is captured in the 17 form of this Stipulated Settlement, that they consider to be a just, fair, adequate, and equitable 18 resolution of the issues in this case; 19 20 WHEREAS, the Center and the Federal Defendants agree that this Stipulated Settlement is in the public interest and is an appropriate way to resolve the remaining disputed issues; 21 NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES STIPULATE AS FOLLOWS: 22 23 SECTION 7 CONSULTATION SCHEDULE 24 1. Compliance with Section 7(a)(2) of the Endangered Species Act 25 The Service shall complete consultation with EPA, pursuant to the applicable 26 regulations, on the potential effects of seven pesticides on the California red-legged frog 27 28 1 Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 25(d), Robert Perciasepe is substituted for Lisa Jackson. 1 1 (Rana draytonii), according to the schedule delineated in Paragraph 2 of this agreement. 2 The seven pesticides are: glyphosate, malathion, simazine, pendimethalin, permethrin, 3 methomyl, and myclobutanil. 4 2. Consultation Schedule 5 No later than one year after the entry of an order by the Court ratifying this Stipulated 6 Settlement, the Service shall conduct consultation and deliver to EPA a draft biological 7 opinion for two of the pesticides listed in Paragraph 1. 8 9 No later than two years after the entry of an order by the Court ratifying this Stipulated 10 Settlement, the Service shall complete consultation for all seven of the pesticides listed 11 in Paragraph 1. 12 13 NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS 14 3. Web-site Content 15 Prior to the issuance of the press release discussed below, the Service shall create a 16 dedicated webpage that displays the following: (i) a summary of the principal terms of the 17 Stipulated Settlement, including the schedule discussed in Paragraph 2; (ii) a hyperlink to 18 the full text of the Stipulated Settlement; (iii) a hyperlink to the EPA’s webpage covering the 19 stipulated injunction entered in Center for Biological Diversity v. Johnson, 02-1580-JSW 20 (“Stipulated Injunction”), which is found at: 21 frog/steps-info.htm; and (iv) a short description of the Stipulated Injunction entered in 22 Center for Biological Diversity v. Johnson, Civ. Case No. 02-1580-JSW (N.D. Cal. Oct. 20, 23 2006), including (1) a statement in bold or underlined text that the pesticide use restrictions 24 in the Stipulated Injunction are still in effect; (2) a list of the counties affected by the 25 Stipulated Injunction; (3) a map of the State of California highlighting the counties where 26 the Stipulated Injunction applies; (4) a statement that EPA has since found that 62 pesticides 27 covered by the Stipulated Injunction “may affect” and are “likely to adversely affect” the 28 California red-legged frog; and (5) a hyperlink to the Service’s webpage on the California 2 1 red-legged frog, which is found at: 2 3 4 Prior to the issuance of the press release discussed below, the Service shall also create a 5 dedicated webpage that will (i) include hyperlinks to all final biological opinions issued after 6 2012 that are the result of consultation between EPA and the Service regarding applications 7 for registration or re-registration under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide 8 Act, 7 U.S.C. § 136, et. seq; (ii) provide a timeline for preparation of all biological opinions 9 imposed by court order; (iii) provide a hyperlink to the dedicated webpage on the Stipulated 10 Settlement that is described above; and (iv) explain that pesticides may be harmful to some 11 endangered species. 12 4. Public Notification of Stipulated Settlement 13 Within two weeks of the Court’s approval of this Stipulated Settlement, the Service shall 14 issue a press release that alerts the public to the Stipulated Settlement and shall post said 15 press release on the homepage of the Service’s webpage, which is found at: 16 The press release shall include hyperlinks to the webpages developed 17 as discussed in Paragraph 3. 18 19 MODIFICATION 20 5. The Parties reserve the right to seek to have this Court modify this Stipulated Settlement 21 because of the Service’s ongoing actions to comply with the ESA, to meet the requirements 22 of other federal agencies or departments, or to deal with circumstances not presently 23 anticipated. The Court will consider such future requests as it deems appropriate. 24 25 DISPUTE RESOLUTION 26 6. In the event of a disagreement between the Parties concerning the interpretation or 27 performance of any aspect of this Stipulated Settlement, the dissatisfied Party shall provide 28 the other Party with written notice of the dispute and a request for negotiations. The Parties 3 1 shall confer in order to attempt to resolve the dispute within 14 days after receipt of the 2 notice, or such time thereafter as is mutually agreed upon. If the Parties are unable to resolve 3 the dispute within 21 days after receipt of the notice, or such time thereafter as is mutually 4 agreed upon, then any Party may petition the Court to resolve the dispute. 5 ATTORNEYS’ FEES 6 7. The Federal Defendants agree that Plaintiff is entitled to reimbursement of reasonable 7 attorneys’ fees and costs. Federal Defendants and Plaintiff agree to attempt to resolve 8 Plaintiff’s claim for fees and costs for all claims in this action expeditiously, without the 9 need for Court intervention. The Parties recognize that Defendants have not waived any 10 defense to and preserve their right to challenge the reasonableness of the amount of 11 attorneys’ fees and costs requested by Plaintiff in the event that Plaintiff and Federal 12 Defendants are unable to resolve Plaintiff’s claim for fees and costs. The Parties further 13 recognize that Plaintiff reserves the right to seek additional fees and costs incurred arising 14 from a need to enforce or defend against efforts to modify this Stipulated Settlement or for 15 any other unforeseen continuation of this action. 16 17 8. If the Federal Defendants and Plaintiff cannot agree on the amount of such fees within 60 18 days of the Court approving this Stipulated Settlement, Plaintiff shall file a motion for 19 attorneys’ fees and costs with the Court in this matter. This 60 day period shall supersede the 20 14 day time period otherwise applicable pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 21 Section 54(d)(2)(B) and the court order approving the Stipulated Settlement will accordingly 22 operate as an enlargement of time pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Section 23 6(b)(1) for Plaintiffs to file a fee motion. 24 25 SCOPE OF THE STIPULATED SETTLEMENT 26 9. It is the expectation and understanding of the Parties that if EPA cancels the pesticide 27 registration of any of the active ingredients listed in Paragraph 1, the Service shall not be 28 required to complete consultation with regard to that active ingredient. 4 1 2 10. No provision of this Stipulated Settlement shall be interpreted as or constitute a 3 commitment or requirement that the Federal Defendants take action in contravention of the 4 ESA, the APA, or any other law or regulation, either substantive or procedural. Nothing in 5 this Stipulated Settlement shall be construed to limit or modify the discretion accorded to the 6 Federal Defendants by the ESA, the APA, or general principles of administrative law with 7 respect to the procedures to be followed in conducting the ESA consultation described 8 above, or as to the substance of any such determinations. 9 10 11. Nothing in this Stipulated Settlement shall bar the Federal Defendants from acting on 11 any matters covered herein in a time frame earlier than required by this Stipulated 12 Settlement, or from taking additional actions not specified herein if the Federal Defendants 13 determines such actions are appropriate under applicable law. 14 15 12. Nothing in this Agreement shall be interpreted as, or shall constitute, a requirement that 16 Defendants are obligated to pay any funds exceeding those available, or take any action in 17 contravention of the Anti-Deficiency Act, 31 U.S.C. § 1341, or any other appropriations law. 18 19 13. The Parties agree that this Stipulated Settlement was negotiated in good faith and that 20 entry of this Stipulated Settlement constitutes a settlement of claims that were vigorously 21 contested, denied, and disputed by the Parties. By entering into this Stipulated Settlement, 22 the Parties do not waive any claim or defense. 23 24 14. The undersigned representatives of each Party certify that they are fully authorized by 25 the Party (or Parties) they represent to agree to the terms and conditions of this Stipulated 26 Settlement and do hereby agree to the terms herein. 27 28 5 1 15. Upon entry of this Stipulated Settlement, Plaintiff’s complaint shall be dismissed without 2 prejudice. Plaintiff resolves its Complaint as to the seven active ingredients listed in 3 Paragraph 1, but Plaintiff reserves the right to bring a new Complaint as provided herein 4 regarding the 57 other active ingredients. Plaintiff agrees not to bring, assist any other Party 5 in bringing, or join the Service, EPA, or any other Party in any court proceeding that 6 concerns a failure to complete consultation for the California red-legged frog as to those 57 7 active ingredients until two years after the Court’s ratification of this Stipulated Settlement 8 as set forth in Paragraph 2 of this Stipulated Settlement. 9 10 16. This Stipulated Settlement does not constitute an admission or evidence of any fact, 11 wrongdoing, misconduct, or liability on the part of the United States, including without 12 limitation, the Federal Defendants, their officers, or any other person affiliated with the 13 Service or EPA, or any interpretation of any applicable provision of law. This Stipulated 14 Settlement has no precedential value and shall not be used as evidence in any other court 15 proceeding or in any other settlement discussions (other than litigation to enforce this 16 Stipulated Settlement). 17 18 17. Plaintiff’s sole judicial remedy to address the merits of any final action that may ensue 19 from the Service’s performance of its obligations under this Stipulated Settlement is to file a 20 separate lawsuit challenging such final action. The Federal Defendants reserve all defenses 21 to any such suit. Nothing in this Stipulated Settlement alters or affects the standards for 22 review of final agency action, or creates jurisdiction that otherwise would not exist to review 23 agency action. 24 25 18. Notwithstanding the dismissal of this action, the Parties have agreed and requested that 26 this Court retain jurisdiction to oversee compliance with the terms of this Stipulated 27 Settlement and to resolve any motions to modify such terms. See Kokkonen v. Guardian Life 28 Ins. Co. of America, 511 U.S. 375 (1994). 6 1 2 19. The terms of this Stipulated Settlement constitute the entire agreement of the Parties, and 3 no statement, agreement or understanding, oral or written, which is not contained herein, 4 shall be recognized or enforced. 5 6 20. The terms of this Stipulated Settlement shall become effective upon entry of an order by 7 the Court ratifying this Stipulated Settlement. 8 9 10 11 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS ORDERED that the Settlement executed by the Parties is hereby incorporated into this Order; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Court shall have continuing jurisdiction to 12 enforce this Order and the terms of the Settlement herein consistent with the terms of that 13 agreement; and 14 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice. The Court finds the claims settled in this action broader than those settled in the Stipulated Injunction issued in case no. 02-1580 JSW dated October 20, 2006 and thereby DENIES CropLife's motion to dismiss as not welltaken. November 4, 2013 Dated:________________________ 15 16 17 18 ____________________________ 19 20 21 22 United States District Judge Presented by: /s Collette Adkins Giese ____________________________________ 26 Collette Adkins Giese (MN Bar # 035059X) Justin Augustine (CA Bar # 235561) CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA OFFICE 351 California Street, Suite 600 San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: (415) 436-9682 Facsimile: (415) 436-9683 27 Attorneys for Plaintiff 23 24 25 28 7 1 2 3 IGNACIA S. MORENO Assistant Attorney General Environment & Natural Resources Division SETH M. BARSKY, Section Chief S. JAY GOVINDAN, Assistant Section Chief 4 5 6 /s Erik E. Petersen ____________________________________ 8 Erik E. Petersen, Trial Attorney Wildlife and Marine Resources Section United States Department of Justice Tel: (202) 305-0339 || Fax: (202) 305-0275 9 Attorneys for Defendants 7 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 8

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?