Overture Services, Inc. v. Google Inc.

Filing 163

STIPULATION Re: Supplemental Claim Construction Briefing by Google Inc.. (Sun, Christine) (Filed on 5/11/2004)

Overture Services, Inc. v. Google Inc.

Doc. 163

Case 3:02-cv-01991-JSW

Document 163

Filed 05/11/2004

Page 1 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

KEKER & VAN NEST, LLP JOHN W. KEKER - #49092 DARALYN J. DURIE - #169825 CHRISTINE P. SUN - #218701 710 Sansome Street San Francisco, CA 94111-1704 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant GOOGLE INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

OVERTURE SERVICES, INC., Plaintiff and Counterdefendant, v. GOOGLE INC., Defendant and Counterclaimant.

Case No. C 02-01991 JSW (EDL) STIPULATION RE: SUPPLEMENTAL CLAIM CONSTRUCTION BRIEFING [Civil Local Rule 7-11]

331500.01

STIPULATION RE: SUPPLEMENTAL CLAIM CONSTRUCTION BRIEFING CASE NO. C 02-01991 JSW (EDL)
Dockets.Justia.com

Case 3:02-cv-01991-JSW

Document 163

Filed 05/11/2004

Page 2 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 7-4(b) and 7-11, the parties stipulate to the following in connection with Defendant Google Inc.'s ("Google") Miscellaneous Administrative Request, filed concurrently herewith: (1) Google may file a supplemental claim construction brief of no more than 2 pages

limited to bringing to the Court's attention additional evidence (i.e., deposition testimony in the Overture v. FindWhat case) related to the disputed terms "database" and "search results list." (2) No later than 7 days after the date of Google's filing, Plaintiff Overture Services,

Inc. ("Overture") may file a brief of no more than 2 pages limited to responding to the arguments and evidence set forth in Google's supplemental claim construction brief. (3) Overture's stipulation to Google's filing of its supplemental claim construction

brief does not constitute an admission that deposition testimony is proper evidence for the Court to consider with respect to the meaning of any of the disputed claim terms in this case. The parties hereby respectfully request that the Court enter the stipulation as its Order. Dated: May 5, 2004 KEKER & VAN NEST, LLP

By:

/s/ Christine P. Sun CHRISTINE P. SUN Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant GOOGLE INC. HELLER EHRMAN WHITE & MCAULIFFE LLP

Dated: May 5, 2004

By:

/s/ Andrew C. Byrnes ANDREW C. BYRNES Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant OVERTURE SERVICES, INC.

I attest that concurrence in the filing of the above stipulation has been obtained from Andrew C. Byrnes.

1
331500.01

STIPULATION RE: SUPPLEMENTAL CLAIM CONSTRUCTION BRIEFING CASE NO. C 02-01991 JSW (EDL)

Case 3:02-cv-01991-JSW

Document 163

Filed 05/11/2004

Page 3 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Dated: May 11, 2004

KEKER & VAN NEST, LLP

By:

/s/ Christine P. Sun CHRISTINE P. SUN Attorneys for Plaintiffs

2
331500.01

STIPULATION RE: SUPPLEMENTAL CLAIM CONSTRUCTION BRIEFING CASE NO. C 02-01991 JSW (EDL)