Overture Services, Inc. v. Google Inc.

Filing 21

STIPULATION selecting Private ADR by Overture Services, Inc. (Berenzweig, Jack)

Download PDF
Overture Services, Inc. v. Google Inc. Doc. 21 Case 3:02-cv-01991-JSW Document 21 Filed 08/05/2002 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION OVERTURE SERVICES, INC., a Delaware Corporation, Plaintiff, vs. GOOGLE INC., a California Corporation, Defendant. ADR CERTIFICATION No. C02-01991 CRB STIPULATION SELECTING ADR PROCESS [ADR L.R. 3-5] The parties stipulate to participate in the following ADR process: Court Processes: Arbitration Private Processes: X Private ADR (Private Mediation) ENE Mediation The parties agree that mediation would be most useful if scheduled around the time of, but prior to, the Court's claim construction hearing. Dated: August 5, 2002 By: /s/ Jack C. Berenzweig BRINKS HOFER GILSON & LIONE Attorney for Plaintiff OVERTURE SERVICES, INC. /s/ Jon B. Streeter KEKER & VAN NEST, L.L.P. Attorney for Defendant GOOGLE INC. Dated: August 5, 2002 By: Dockets.Justia.com Case 3:02-cv-01991-JSW Document 21 Filed 08/05/2002 Page 2 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SIGNATURE AND CERTIFICATION BY PARTIES AND LEAD TRIAL COUNSEL Pursuant to Civ. L.R. 16 and ADR L.R. 3-5(b), each of the undersigned certifies that he or she has read either the handbook entitled "Dispute Resolution Procedures in the Northern District of California," or the specified portions of the ADR Unit's Internet site <www.adr.cand.uscourts.gov>, discussed the available dispute resolution options provided by the court and private entities, and considered whether this case might benefit from any of them. Dated: August 5, 2002 By: /s/ Jeanine Hayes OVERTURE SERVICES, INC. Dated: August 5, 2002 By: /s/ Jack C. Berenzweig BRINKS HOFER GILSON & LIONE Attorney for Plaintiff OVERTURE SERVICES, INC. Dated: August 5, 2002 By: /s/ David Drummond GOOGLE INC. Dated: August 5, 2002 By: /s/ Jon B. Streeter KEKER & VAN NEST, L.L.P. Attorney for Defendant GOOGLE INC. I hereby attest, pursuant to section X of General Order 45, that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from Jeanine Hayes, David Drummond, and Jon B. Streeter. Dated: August 5, 2002 By: /s/ Jack C. Berenzweig BRINKS HOFER GILSON & LIONE Attorney for Plaintiff OVERTURE SERVICES, INC. STIPULATING SELECTING ADR PROCESS AND ADR CERTIFICATION -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?