Overture Services, Inc. v. Google Inc.

Filing 50

CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER . Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on January 31, 2003. (jswlc2, )

Download PDF
Overture Services, Inc. v. Google Inc. Doc. 50 Case 3:02-cv-01991-JSW Document 50 Filed 01/31/2003 Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 305458.01 BRINKS HOFER GILSON & LIONE JACK C. BERENZWEIG (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) WILLIAM H. FRANKEL (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) JASON C. WHITE (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) CHARLES M. MCMAHON (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) NBC Tower - Suite 3600 455 North Cityfront Plaza Drive Chicago, Illinois 60611 Telephone: (312) 321-4200 Facsimile: (312) 321-4299 Attorneys For Plaintiff OVERTURE SERVICES, INC. KEKER & VAN NEST, LLP JOHN W. KEKER - #49092 JON B. STREETER - #101970 DARALYN J. DURIE - #169825 MICHAEL S. KWUN - #198945 710 Sansome Street San Francisco, CA 94111-1704 Telephone: (415) 391-5400 Facsimile: (415) 397-7188 Attorneys for Defendant GOOGLE INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION OVERTURE SERVICES, INC., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, v. GOOGLE INC., a California corporation, Defendant. Case No. C 02-01991 JSW ADR CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER Judge: Hon. Jeffrey S. White CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER CASE NO. C 02-01991 JSW ADR Dockets.Justia.com Case 3:02-cv-01991-JSW Document 50 Filed 01/31/2003 Page 2 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 The Court has considered the Joint Case Management Statement filed by plaintiff Overture Services, Inc. ("Overture") and defendant Google Inc. ("Google") on January 24, 2003. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: The presumptive limit on the number of depositions shall be fifteen per party, exclusive of expert depositions. To the extent that one or both parties believes that any further relief from any other discovery limitations is necessary, including additional depositions, the party or parties may seek such relief by an appropriate stipulation and motion to the Court as warranted. The Court defers the setting of any post-claim construction dates or a trial date. With respect to claim construction proceedings, the Court hereby adopts the following schedule: Event Last Day for the Parties to Exchange Source Code Responsive to Discovery Requests Served Prior to December 18, 2002, Subject to Any Appropriate Objections Last Day for Overture to Serve Revised Preliminary Infringement Contentions with Respect to Claim 14 of the '361 Patent Last Day for Google to Serve Preliminary Invalidity Contentions Last Day for Simultaneous Exchange of Proposed Terms and Claim Elements for Construction and/or Governed by 35 U.S.C. 112 6 Last Day for Simultaneous Exchange of Preliminary Claim Constructions and Extrinsic Evidence Last Day for Parties to File Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement Last Day to Complete Mediation Before Private Mediator Last Day to Take Discovery Relating to Claim Construction Case Management Conference Last Day for Overture to File Opening Claim Construction Brief and Supporting Evidence 4-5 4-4 3-1 3-3 4-1 4-2 4-3 Patent L.R. Date 1/24/03 2/7/03 2/21/03 3/10/03 3/31/03 4/22/03 4/28/03 5/22/03 5/23/03 at 3:00 p.m. 6/6/03 1 305458.01 CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER CASE NO. C 02-01991 JSW ADR Case 3:02-cv-01991-JSW Document 50 Filed 01/31/2003 Page 3 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Event Last Day for Google to File Responsive Claim Construction Brief and Supporting Evidence Last Day for Overture to File Reply Claim Construction Brief and Rebuttal Evidence Patent L.R. 4-5 4-5 Date 6/20/03 7/1/03 7/16/03 at 8:30 a.m. Technology Tutorial for Court and Claim Construction Prehearing Conference 4-6 Claim Construction Hearing 4-6 7/17/03 at 8:30 a.m. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 31, 2003 By: ________/s/_____________________ HONORABLE JEFFREY S. WHITE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2 305458.01 CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER CASE NO. C 02-01991 JSW ADR

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?