Rodriguez v. Runnels

Filing 18

USCA ORDER : Petitioner has not demonstrated that this case warrants the intervention of this court by means of the extraordinary remedy of mandamus. Accordingly, the petition is denied. (mcl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/16/2010)

Case: 09-73926

02/10/2010

Page: 1 of 2

ID: 7227018

DktEntry: 3

FILED
U N IT E D STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
FEB 10 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U . S . C O U R T OF APPE A L S

In re: JOSE GARCIA RODRIGUEZ.

N o . 09-73926 D .C . No. 3:02-cv-02481-CRB N o rth ern District of California, San Francisco

JO S E GARCIA RODRIGUEZ, Petitioner,

ORDER v. U N IT E D STATES DISTRICT COURT F O R THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF C A L IF O R N IA , Respondent, D . L. RUNNELS, Real Party in Interest.

B efo re: CANBY, GOULD and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges. P etitio n er has not demonstrated that this case warrants the intervention of th is court by means of the extraordinary remedy of mandamus. See Bauman v. U n ited States Dist. Court, 557 F.2d 650 (9th Cir. 1977). Accordingly, the petition is denied.

KW /M O A T T

Case: 09-73926

02/10/2010

Page: 2 of 2

ID: 7227018

DktEntry: 3

T h e motions to proceed in forma pauperis and for appointment of counsel are denied as moot. N o motions for reconsideration, rehearing, clarification, or any other su b m issio n s shall be filed or entertained in this closed docket.

KW /M O A T T

2

0 9 -7 3 9 2 6