Lam Research Corporation v. Schunk Semiconductor et al

Filing 271

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 270 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re 264 MOTION for Reconsideration of the Court's Revised Order Re Claim Construction Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Modifying Response Date on Opposition t o Motion for Reconsideration filed by Lam Research Corporation, Set/Reset Deadlines as to 270 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re 264 MOTION for Reconsideration of the Court's Revised Order Re Claim Construction Stip ulation and [Proposed] Order Modifying Response Date on Opposition to Motion for Reconsideration, 264 MOTION for Reconsideration of the Court's Revised Order Re Claim Construction. Responses due by 12/24/2013.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 12/11/13. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/11/2013)

1 STUART C. CLARK (SBN 124152)
[e-mail]
2 GERALD P. DODSON (SBN 139602)
3 [e-mail]
BRYAN J. BOYLE (SBN 253725)
4 [e-mail]
CARR & FERRELL LLP
5
120 Constitution Drive
6 Menlo Park, California 94025
Telephone: [phone]
7 Facsimile: [phone]
8

Attorneys for LAM RESEARCH
9 CORPORATION
10
11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

12

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

13

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

14
15 LAM RESEARCH CORPORATION,
16

CASE NO. CV03-01335 EMC (JCS)

Plaintiff,

17
v.
18
19

SHUNK SEMICONDUCTOR and XYCARB
CERAMICS;

STIPULATION AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER
MODIFYING RESPONSE DATE
ON OPPOSITION TO MOTION
FOR RECONSIDERATION

20
Defendants.

21
22

AND RELATED CROSS ACTION.

23
24
25
26
27
28

WHEREAS:
A.

Plaintiff and counter defendant Lam Research Corporation (“Lam”) seeks an

extension of time from December 20, 2013 until December 24, 2013 to file its opposition to the
motion for reconsideration of defendant and counterclaimant Xycarb Ceramics, Inc. (“Xycarb”);

{00736073v1}

1

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING RESPONSE DATE ON
OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION– CASE NO. CV03-01335 EMC (JCS)

1

B.

Xycarb has no objection to Lam being granted the additional time for filing,

2 referenced above:
3

NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through

4 their undersigned counsel, that the Court may enter an order allowing Lam until December 24,
5 2013 to file its opposition brief to Xycarb’s motion for reconsideration.
6

Dated: December 10, 2013

SHAUB & WILLIAMS, LLP

7
8
9

By: /s/Lisbeth Bosshart Merrill
LISBETH BOSSHART MERRILL

10

Attorneys for XYCARB CERAMICS, INC.

11
12 Dated: December 10, 2013

CARR & FERRELL LLP

13
14
15

By: /s/ Stuart C. Clark
STUART C. CLARK

16

Attorneys for LAM RESEARCH CORPORATION

17

S DISTRICT

ACCORDING TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ATE
ORDERED

UNIT
ED

19

T

21

TED

GRAN

R NIA

20 DATED: December 11, 2013

C

RT
U
O

S

HON. EDWARD M. CHEN
en
UNITED STATES DISTRICThJUDGE
rd M. C
ge Edwa
Jud

H

ER

LI

RT

23

FO

NO

22

24
25

A

18

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

26
27
28

{00736073v1}

2

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING RESPONSE DATE ON
OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION– CASE NO. CV03-01335 EMC (JCS)

__