Bull et al v. City and County of San Francisco et al

Filing 364

ORDER SETTING HEARING ON ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO STAY. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on June 9, 2011. (crblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/9/2011)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11
12

15

v.
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN
FRANCISCO, et al.,
Defendants.

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

ORDER SETTING HEARING ON
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO
STAY

Plaintiffs,

13
14

No. C 03-01840 CRB

BULL, et al.,

/

On June 3, 2011, Defendants filed an “Administrative Motion to Stay Trial Court
Proceedings Pending the Decision of the United States Supreme Court in Albert W. Florence
v. Board of Chosen Freeholders of the County of Burlington, et al., No. 10-945.” Dkt. 361.
Plaintiffs opposed that Motion on June 7, 2011, arguing that (1) a motion to stay the case is
not an “Administrative Motion” under the Local Rules and (2) a stay is not warranted. Dkt.
362. The Court agrees with Plaintiffs that a Motion to Stay the Case is not an Administrative
Motion. However, the Court also believes that it makes sense to address this issue on an
expedited basis. Accordingly, the Court sets forth the following briefing schedule and will
hold a hearing on this matter on July 5, 2011 at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 6.
//
//
//

1

Defendants’ Brief in Support of Motion to Stay1 – June 17, 2011

2

Plaintiffs’ Brief in Opposition to Motion to Stay2 – June 24, 2011

3

Defendants’ Brief in Reply3 – June 29, 2011

4

IT IS SO ORDERED.

5
6
7

CHARLES R. BREYER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dated: June 9, 2011

8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
1

Brief shall not exceed 15 pages.

2

Brief shall not exceed 15 pages.

3

Brief shall not exceed 10 pages.

27
28

G:\CRBALL\2003\1840\Order Setting Hearing on Adminstrative Motion to Stay.wpd

2