Edgerly v. City and County of San Francisco et al

Filing 219

ORDER REGARDING SUBMISSIONS FOR FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE. Signed by Judge Alsup on August 13, 2010. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/13/2010)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ERRIS EDGERLY, Plaintiff, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, DAVID GOFF, JOHN CONEFREY, FREDERICK SCHIFF, AND DOES 1 TO 20, Defendants. / ORDER REGARDING SUBMISSIONS FOR FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE No. C 03-02169 WHA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 For the final pretrial conference, counsel shall prepare a fresh and completely updated joint submission. Do not rely on what was filed several years ago. The proposed jury instructions, for example, must incorporate the Ninth Circuit's current view of the law on each claim to be tried as well as a correct view of all other aspects of law that will be tried. Counsel must meet and confer in person (not by letter or over the phone) to try to reach an agreement on the jury instructions as well as all other parts of the joint submission. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: August 13, 2010. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?