Edgerly v. City and County of San Francisco et al

Filing 363

ORDER granting 362 MOTION to Continue DECEMBER 13, 2013 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; DECLARATION OF SEAN CONNOLLY IN SUPPORT THEREOF filed by John Conefrey, David Goff, City and County of San Francisco. Case Management Statement due by 1/10/2014. Case Management Conference reset for 1/17/2014 08:30 AM in Courtroom 6, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 11/25/2013. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/26/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 DENNIS J. HERRERA, State Bar #36508 City Attorney CHERYL ADAMS, State Bar #164194 Chief Trial Attorney SEAN F. CONNOLLY, State Bar #152235 Deputy City Attorney Fox Plaza 1390 Market Street, Sixth Floor San Francisco, California 94102-5408 Telephone: (415) 554-3863 Facsimile: (415) 554-3837 Attorneys for Defendants CITY & COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ET AL 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 ERRIS EDGERLY, 13 14 15 16 17 Plaintiff, vs. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, DAVID GOFF AND JOHN CONEFREY Defendants. USDC No: C03 2169 CRB ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ET AL’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONTINUE THE DECEMBER 13, 2013 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Trial Date: Not Set 18 19 20 For good cause appearing, the Court hereby ORDERS that the Case Management 21 Conference set for December 13, 2013, be vacated, and that the matter be rescheduled for a Case 22 Management Conference on January 17, 2014 at 8:30a.m.. A case management statement is due 23 one week before the conference. S UNIT ED ED ORDER H ER LI RT 27 FO NO 26 R NIA O IT IS S ____________________________________ HON. CHARLES R. BREYER yer UNITED STATES Charles R. Bre JUDGE DISTRICT Judge Dated: November 25, 2013 28 ORDER RE ADMIN MOTION FOR ORDER TO CONT’ CMC; USDC No.: 03-2169 CRB 1 A 25 RT U O 24 ISTRIC ES D TC AT T N F D IS T IC T O R C N:\pdf docs\2169edgerly.doc

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?