Edgerly v. City and County of San Francisco et al
Filing
363
ORDER granting 362 MOTION to Continue DECEMBER 13, 2013 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; DECLARATION OF SEAN CONNOLLY IN SUPPORT THEREOF filed by John Conefrey, David Goff, City and County of San Francisco. Case Management Statement due by 1/10/2014. Case Management Conference reset for 1/17/2014 08:30 AM in Courtroom 6, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 11/25/2013. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/26/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
DENNIS J. HERRERA, State Bar #36508
City Attorney
CHERYL ADAMS, State Bar #164194
Chief Trial Attorney
SEAN F. CONNOLLY, State Bar #152235
Deputy City Attorney
Fox Plaza
1390 Market Street, Sixth Floor
San Francisco, California 94102-5408
Telephone:
(415) 554-3863
Facsimile:
(415) 554-3837
Attorneys for Defendants
CITY & COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ET AL
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12
ERRIS EDGERLY,
13
14
15
16
17
Plaintiff,
vs.
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN
FRANCISCO, DAVID GOFF AND
JOHN CONEFREY
Defendants.
USDC No: C03 2169 CRB
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN
FRANCISCO, ET AL’S
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO
CONTINUE THE DECEMBER 13, 2013
CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE
Trial Date:
Not Set
18
19
20
For good cause appearing, the Court hereby ORDERS that the Case Management
21
Conference set for December 13, 2013, be vacated, and that the matter be rescheduled for a Case
22
Management Conference on January 17, 2014 at 8:30a.m.. A case management statement is due
23
one week before the conference.
S
UNIT
ED
ED
ORDER
H
ER
LI
RT
27
FO
NO
26
R NIA
O
IT IS S
____________________________________
HON. CHARLES R. BREYER
yer
UNITED STATES Charles R. Bre JUDGE
DISTRICT
Judge
Dated: November 25, 2013
28
ORDER RE ADMIN MOTION FOR ORDER TO
CONT’ CMC; USDC No.: 03-2169 CRB
1
A
25
RT
U
O
24
ISTRIC
ES D
TC
AT
T
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
N:\pdf docs\2169edgerly.doc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?