Caldwell et al v. Fedex Corporation et al

Filing 347

A Copy of USCA ORDER: Briefing Schedule. (ys, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/7/2009)

Download PDF
Case: 08-15904 04/06/2009 Page: 1 of 2 DktEntry: 6871867 FILED U N IT E D STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT APR 06 2009 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U . S . C O U R T OF APPE A L S K A L IN I BOYKIN; et al., Plaintiffs - Appellees, W A U K E E N Q. MCCOY, Appellant, v. F E D E X EXPRESS, a Delaware c o r p o r a tio n , Defendant. N o . 08-15904 D .C . Nos. 3:03-CV-02659-SI 3 :0 3 - C V - 0 2 8 7 8 - S I N o rth ern District of California, San Francisco ORDER A p p e lla n t's opposed motion to strike the answering brief and supplemental ex cerp ts is granted in part. The following portions of the supplemental excerpts are striken: SER 1-47, SER 565-605 and SER 48-118. To the extent the motion seek s to strike SER 210-219, 272-278 and 279-327, the motion shall be referred to th e merits panel for resolution. The portions of the brief that rely upon SER 481 1 8 are stricken; to the extent appellant seeks to strike further portions of the an sw erin g brief, the motion is referred to the merits panel for resolution. Appellees' cross-motion to supplement the record is denied. 9th Cir. R. 10-2. cb /Pro Mo Case: 08-15904 04/06/2009 Page: 2 of 2 DktEntry: 6871867 A p p ellees' alternative request for judicial notice is referred to the merits panel for reso lu tio n . The Court may elect to strike the portions of the briefs that rely on the m aterial to be judicially noticed if it declines to grant the request. Advisory Note to Circuit Rule 27-1. Appellant's motion for an extension of time to file the reply brief is granted. The reply brief is due 14 days after the date of this order. F o r the Court: MOLLY C. DWYER, Clerk C o le Benson S u p e rv is in g Deputy Clerk N in th Circuit Rule 27-7/Advisory Note to R u le 27 and Ninth Circuit Rule 27-10 cb /Pro Mo

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?