Roe et al v. Estate of Thomas White et al

Filing 1183

Order re: Post-Judgment Discovery Process. Motions due by 9/25/2013. Responses due by 10/9/2013. Replies due by 10/16/2013. Discovery Hearing set for 10/23/2013 at 1:00 PM in Courtroom A, 15th Floor, San Francisco before Magistrate Judge Nathanael M. Cousins. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nathanael M. Cousins on 08/14/2013. (nclc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/14/2013)

Roe et al v. White et al

Doc. 1183

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

10
11 JOSE ROE, and others,

Case No. 03-cv-04035 CRB (NC)

12

ORDER RE: POST-JUDGMENT
REVIEW OF REPLOGLE FILES

13

Plaintiffs,
v.

14 THOMAS F. WHITE, and others,
15

Re: Dkt. No. 1086

Defendants.

16
17

Coombs Reporting, the outside vendor hired by defendants, has finished assigning

18 identification numbers to the responsive documents, in accordance with this Court’s July
19 31, 2013 order. The responsive documents have been reproduced as searchable PDFs onto
20 a CD. Coombs also reproduced the two CDs previously described by the Court as
21 responsive. The Court has created a log of the responsive materials, which lists only a
22 general description of the materials. Plaintiffs’ counsel and the guardian ad litem must
23 come to chambers to retrieve their copies of the responsive materials (three CDs and the
24 Court’s log) by August 16, 2013 at 5:00 p.m.
25

At the conclusion of their review, the guardian ad litem and plaintiffs’ counsel will

26 produce all non-privileged materials to defendant’s counsel and file a privilege log. The
27 privilege log must specify the materials alleged to be privileged, the bases for the privilege,
28 and enough information for a third party to understand the reasons supporting the
Case No. 03-cv-04035 CRB (NC)
ORDER RE: POST-JUDGMENT
REVIEW
Dockets.Justia.com

1 designation. The privilege log must be filed and the materials produced to defendant’s
2 counsel by September 16, 2013.
3

Defendant may file a motion objecting to any asserted privilege by September 25,

4 2013. Oppositions will be due by October 9, 2013. Any reply will be due on October 16,
5 2013. The Court will hold a hearing on October 23, 2013 at 1:00 p.m. in Courtroom A,
6 15th Floor, U.S. District Court, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco.
7

All of the responsive materials produced, as well as the Court’s log of the responsive

8 materials, are subject to the existing protective order. Dkt. No. 1044. In addition, the
9 responsive materials and the Court’s log are filed under seal. The Court’s log is also ex
10 parte and available only to plaintiffs’ counsel and the guardian ad litem until they complete
11 their review of the responsive materials and determine whether the log reveals any
12 privileged information.
13

Any party may object to this order within fourteen days. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a).

14

IT IS SO ORDERED.

15

Date: August 14, 2013

_________________________
Nathanael M. Cousins
United States Magistrate Judge

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 03-cv-04035 CRB (NC)
ORDER RE: POST-JUDGMENT
REVIEW

2