Roe et al v. Estate of Thomas White et al

Filing 1251

ORDER OF CLARIFICATION. Signed by Judge Nathanael M. Cousins on July 29, 2014. (nclc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/29/2014)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

11
12 JOSE ROE, and others,

Case No. 03-cv-04035 CRB (NC)

13

ORDER OF CLARIFICATION

14

Plaintiffs,
v.

Re: Dkt. No. 1246

15 THOMAS F. WHITE, and others,
16

Defendants.

17
18

The Court ordered plaintiffs to “submit to the Court document 00322, with redactions

19 narrowly limited to remove discussion of privileged conversations with counsel or an agent
20 of counsel.” Dkt. No. 1246 at 3. The Court now clarifies that this refers to the document
21 beginning at bates number 00322 and ending in bates number 00328, which was submitted
22 for in camera review as Exhibit X. The Court was not referring to only the first page of the
23 document, but to the document in its entirety. Plaintiffs are ordered to submit to the Court
24 within seven days of this order Exhibit X, bates number 00322-00328, narrowly redacted to
25 remove references to privileged conversation. Should plaintiffs determine that no
26 redactions are necessary, plaintiffs must produce the document in its entirety to defendant
27 White within seven days of this order.
28
Case No. 03-cv-04035 CRB (NC)
ORDER OF CLARIFICATION

1

Any party may object to this order within fourteen days. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a).

2

IT IS SO ORDERED.

3

Date: July 29, 2014

_________________________
Nathanael M. Cousins
United States Magistrate Judge

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 03-cv-04035 CRB (NC)
ORDER OF CLARIFICATION

2