Hartman v. Gilead Sciences, Inc. et al
Filing
192
ORDER denying request to continue case management conference; 1/16/09 remains on calendar. Signed by Judge Illston on 12/29/08. (ts, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/29/2008)
Case 3:03-cv-04999-SI
Document 190
Filed 12/18/2008
Page 1 of 5
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
COOLEY GODWARD LLP
A T T O R N E Y S AT L A W SAN FRANCISCO
COOLEY GODWARD LLP STEPHEN C. NEAL (170085) (sneal@cooley.com) JOHN C. DWYER (136533) (jdwyer@cooley.com) MATTHEW D. BROWN (196972) (mbrown@cooley.com) JEFFREY M. KABAN (235743) (jkaban@cooley.com) 5 Palo Alto Square 3000 El Camino Real The Court will leave the case management Palo Alto, CA 94306-2155 on calendar for scheduling purposes. Telephone: (650) 843-5000 Facsimile: (650) 857-0663 Attorneys for Defendants GILEAD SCIENCES, INC., JOHN C. MARTIN, ES DISTRIC TC JOHN F. MILLIGAN, MARK L. PERRY, NORBERT W. AT T BISCHOFBERGER, ANTHONY CARRACIOLO and WILLIAM A. LEE
RT U O
UNIT ED
S
In re GILEAD SCIENCES SECURITIES LITIGATION,
E R Case No. C-03-4999CSI N F CLASS ACTION O D IS T IC T R
A
This Document Relates To: ALL ACTIONS
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO RESCHEDULE THE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
WHEREAS, by decision dated August 11, 2008, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reversed a previous dismissal of this action and remanded it back to the District Court for the Northern District of California; and WHEREAS, a Case Management Conference in this action has been set by the Court for January 16, 2009; and WHEREAS, Defendants have advised Plaintiffs that they intend to renew their motion to dismiss this action on grounds not yet ruled upon by the previous decisions in this case, and plaintiffs intend to oppose such motion; and
785316 v1/PA
1.
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROP.] ORDER TO RESCHEDULE CMC HEARING CASE NO. C-03-4999 SI
LI
FO
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA on san Illst udge Su J
R NIA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DENIE
D
NO
RT
H
Case 3:03-cv-04999-SI
Document 190
Filed 12/18/2008
Page 2 of 5
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
COOLEY GODWARD LLP
A T T O R N E Y S AT L A W SAN FRANCISCO
WHEREAS, discovery in this action will be stayed pursuant to the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act ("PSLRA") upon Defendants' filing of their renewed motion to dismiss; and WHEREAS, Defendants have advised Plaintiffs that they intend to file a petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of the United States and reserve their right to move to stay all proceedings in this action pending a decision on such petition, and Plaintiffs have advised Defendants that they would oppose such stay; and WHEREAS, in light of these outstanding issues and for purposes of judicial efficiency and economy, the parties believe that a Case Management Conference is premature, and have agreed on a briefing schedule for Defendants' renewed motion to dismiss; NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereby stipulate and agree, as follows: 1. 2009. 2. 3. 4. Plaint iffs' opposition to the motion shall be filed and served by April 14, 2009. Defendants' reply to the opposition shall be filed and served by May 14, 2009. In the event that defendants move to stay all proceedings in the action pending a Defendants' renewed motion to dismiss shall be filed and served by February 13,
ruling on their petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court, the parties will meet and confer in good faith to attempt to stipulate to a schedule for such motion. 5. The Case Management Conference currently scheduled for January 16, 2009 shall
be removed from this Court's calendar and will be rescheduled for a date thirty (30) days after this Court enters its order on Defendants' motion to dismiss or at the Court's earliest convenience thereafter
785316 v1/PA
2.
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROP.] ORDER TO RESCHEDULE CMC HEARING CASE NO. C-03-4999 SI
Case 3:03-cv-04999-SI
Document 190
Filed 12/18/2008
Page 3 of 5
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
COOLEY GODWARD LLP
A T T O R N E Y S AT L A W SAN FRANCISCO
IT IS SO STIPULATED. DATED: December 18, 2008 COOLEY GODWARD KRONISH LLP
_/s/ John C. Dwyer_____________________ John C. Dwyer Counsel for Defendants
DATED: December 18, 2008
KAPLAN FOX & KILSHEIMER LLP
_/s/ Linda M. Fong________________________ Linda M Fong Liason Counsel for Plaintiffs Joshua H. Vinik Lori G. Feldman (admitted pro hac vice) Ross Brooks MILBERG LLP One Pennsylvania Plaza New York, NY 10119 Telephone: (212) 594-5300 Facsimile: (212) 868-1229 David George (admitted pro hac vice) Robert J. Robbins (admitted pro hac vice) COUGHLIN STOIA GELLER RUDMAN & ROBBINS LLP 197 S. Federal Highway, Suite 200 Boca Raton, FL 33432 Telephone: 561-750-3000 Fax: 561-750-3364 Co-Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs
785316 v1/PA
3.
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROP.] ORDER TO RESCHEDULE CMC HEARING CASE NO. C-03-4999 SI
Case 3:03-cv-04999-SI
Document 190
Filed 12/18/2008
Page 4 of 5
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
COOLEY GODWARD LLP
A T T O R N E Y S AT L A W SAN FRANCISCO
[PROPOSED] ORDER The above stipulation having been considered and good cause appearing therefore, IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED:___________________
_________________________________________ The Honorable Susan Illston UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
785316 v1/PA
4.
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROP.] ORDER TO RESCHEDULE CMC HEARING CASE NO. C-03-4999 SI
Case 3:03-cv-04999-SI
Document 190
Filed 12/18/2008
Page 5 of 5
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
COOLEY GODWARD LLP
A T T O R N E Y S AT L A W SAN FRANCISCO
FILER'S ATTESTATION Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X, Subparagraph B, the undersigned attests that all parties have concurred in the filing of this Joint Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Reschedule the Case Management Conference.
Dated: December 18, 2008
COOLEY GODWARD KRONISH LLP
By: John C. Dwyer
/s/
785316 v1/PA
5.
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROP.] ORDER TO RESCHEDULE CMC HEARING CASE NO. C-03-4999 SI
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?