Amkor Technology, Inc. v. Carsem (M) Sdn Bhd et al

Filing 74

ORDER DENYING PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY ANDREW PRATT by Hon. William Alsup denying 68 Motion for Pro Hac Vice.(whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/14/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
AMKOR TECHNOLOGY, Inc.,

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12
13
14

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER DENYING PRO HAC
VICE APPLICATION OF
ATTORNEY ANDREW PRATT

CARSEM (M) SDN BHD, et al.,,
Defendants.
/

15
16

No. C 03-5116 WHA

The pro hac vice application of Attorney Andrew Pratt (Dkt. No. 68) is DENIED for

17

failing to specify membership in good standing of a United States Court or the highest court of

18

another State or the District of Columbia. Merely claiming membership of “the bar of the state

19

of Washington” is insufficient under the civil local rules. While the application fee does not

20

need to be paid again, the application cannot be processed until a corrected form is submitted.

21
22

IT IS SO ORDERED.

23
24
25
26
27
28

Dated: January 14, 2013.

WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE