Amkor Technology, Inc. v. Carsem (M) Sdn Bhd et al
Filing
93
ORDER REGARDING STAY AND NOTICE OF PTO ACTION. Signed by Judge Alsup on February 18, 2014. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/18/2014)
1
2
3
4
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER REGARDING STAY
AND NOTICE OF PTO ACTION
CARSEM (M) SDN BHD, et al.,
Defendants.
/
13
14
No. C 03-05116 WHA
AMKOR TECHNOLOGY, INC.,
Plaintiff commenced this action in 2003. A substantial portion of the past ten years,
15
however, have been consumed by the parties’ requests for a continuous stay pending proceedings
16
in the International Trade Commission (ITC). After four initial determinations and a final
17
determination, the Federal Circuit reversed the final determination and remanded the
18
investigation. That investigation is currently pending, according to the parties.
19
The operative complaint filed in 2003 asserted infringement of three United States
20
patents. On February 13, defendants filed a notice stating that the United States Patent and
21
Trademark Office rejected all pending claims in one of the asserted patents which was under
22
reexamination. A December 2013 order maintained the current stay and required a joint status
23
report by March 12, 2014, or within ten days after the ITC issues a ruling (Dkt. No. 90).
24
25
26
27
28
By NOON ON FEBRUARY 21, the parties shall file a joint status report regarding how (or
if) they intend to proceed, and whether the stay should continue.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: February 18, 2014.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?