Alvarado et al v. Fedex Corporation

Filing 1734

ORDER Further Case Management Conference set for 7/1/2011 03:00 PM. (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/27/2011)

Download PDF
1 LAW OFFICES OF STEPHEN M. MURPHY STEPHEN M. MURPHY (No. 103768) 2 JEREMY A. GRAHAM (No. 234166) 180 Montgomery Street, Suite 940 3 San Francisco, CA 94104 Tel: (415) 986-1338 4 Fax: (415) 986-1231 5 LAW OFFICE OF GERALD CLAUSEN GERALD CLAUSEN (No. 99483) 6 44 Montgomery Street, Suite 3340 San Francisco, CA 94111 7 Tel: (415) 391-4475 Fax: (415) 296-7049 8 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 9 CHARLOTTE BOSWELL 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 11 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) ) v. ) ) ) ) ) FEDEX CORPORATION, a Delaware ) corporation, dba FEDEX EXPRESS, ) ) Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) _________________________________ ) EDWARD ALVARADO, et al. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 NO. CV 04-0098 SI [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING CONTINUANCE OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Date: Time: Courtroom: Judge: May 27, 2011 3:30 p.m. 10, 19th Floor Hon. Susan Illston 22 23 24 25 26 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING CONTINUANCE OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Case No. CV 04-0098 SI 1 The parties having submitted a Joint Case Management Conference Statement 2 requesting a continuance of the Case Management Conference currently scheduled for 3 May 27, 2011 at 3:30 p.m. to a date after the Court has ruled on the issue of Waukeen 4 McCoy's and Kay Parker's entitlement to statutory and contingency fees, the Court 5 hereby GRANTS that request and continues the current Case Management Conference 6 to ________, 2011 at ________. July 1 3 p.m. 7 Dated: May __, 2011 26 8 9 10 ____________________________ Hon. Susan Y. Illston United States District Judge Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING CONTINUANCE OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Case No. CV 04-0098 SI 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?