Alvarado et al v. Fedex Corporation
Filing
1734
ORDER Further Case Management Conference set for 7/1/2011 03:00 PM. (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/27/2011)
1 LAW OFFICES OF STEPHEN M. MURPHY
STEPHEN M. MURPHY (No. 103768)
2 JEREMY A. GRAHAM (No. 234166)
180 Montgomery Street, Suite 940
3 San Francisco, CA 94104
Tel: (415) 986-1338
4 Fax: (415) 986-1231
5 LAW OFFICE OF GERALD CLAUSEN
GERALD CLAUSEN (No. 99483)
6 44 Montgomery Street, Suite 3340
San Francisco, CA 94111
7 Tel: (415) 391-4475
Fax: (415) 296-7049
8
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
9 CHARLOTTE BOSWELL
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
11
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
)
v.
)
)
)
)
)
FEDEX CORPORATION, a Delaware )
corporation, dba FEDEX EXPRESS,
)
)
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
_________________________________ )
EDWARD ALVARADO, et al.
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
NO.
CV 04-0098 SI
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
CONTINUANCE OF CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
Date:
Time:
Courtroom:
Judge:
May 27, 2011
3:30 p.m.
10, 19th Floor
Hon. Susan Illston
22
23
24
25
26
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING CONTINUANCE OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
Case No. CV 04-0098 SI
1
The parties having submitted a Joint Case Management Conference Statement
2 requesting a continuance of the Case Management Conference currently scheduled for
3 May 27, 2011 at 3:30 p.m. to a date after the Court has ruled on the issue of Waukeen
4 McCoy's and Kay Parker's entitlement to statutory and contingency fees, the Court
5 hereby GRANTS that request and continues the current Case Management Conference
6 to ________, 2011 at ________.
July 1
3 p.m.
7
Dated: May __, 2011
26
8
9
10
____________________________
Hon. Susan Y. Illston
United States District Judge
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING CONTINUANCE OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
Case No. CV 04-0098 SI
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?