Alvarado et al v. Fedex Corporation
Filing
1829
ORDER RE: CHARLOTTE BOSWELL'S FEBRUARY 21, 2012 FILING(Illston, Susan) (Filed on 2/22/2012)
1
2
3
4
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
EDWARD ALVARADO, et al.,
8
9
Plaintiffs,
ORDER RE: CHARLOTTE BOSWELL’S
FEBRUARY 21, 2012 FILING
v.
10
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
No. C 04-0098 SI, No. C 04-0099 SI
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION,
11
Defendant.
/
12
13
On February 21, 2012, plaintiff Charlotte Boswell filed a request for a status conference stating
14
that a dispute between plaintiff and her former attorneys Stephen Murphy and Jerry Clausen regarding
15
attorneys’ fees will be submitted to the State Bar’s Fee Arbitration Program, and that plaintiff’s
16
settlement of the punitive damages portion of the case has been paid.
17
Based upon these representations, the Court finds that a status conference is unnecessary. The
18
Ninth Circuit affirmed plaintiff Boswell’s compensatory damages award, and reversed and remanded
19
only with regard to the punitive damages award. Plaintiff Boswell’s punitive damages claim has now
20
been settled. Dismissals or judgments have been entered with regard to all other plaintiffs, and the
21
litigation in this Court regarding attorneys’ fees has been completed. Accordingly, the Court directs
22
plaintiff to file a dismissal of her claims, and once the dismissal is filed, the Clerk shall close this case.
23
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
25
26
27
28
Dated: February 22, 2012
SUSAN ILLSTON
United States District Judge
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?