Alvarado et al v. Fedex Corporation

Filing 1829

ORDER RE: CHARLOTTE BOSWELL'S FEBRUARY 21, 2012 FILING(Illston, Susan) (Filed on 2/22/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 EDWARD ALVARADO, et al., 8 9 Plaintiffs, ORDER RE: CHARLOTTE BOSWELL’S FEBRUARY 21, 2012 FILING v. 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California No. C 04-0098 SI, No. C 04-0099 SI FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION, 11 Defendant. / 12 13 On February 21, 2012, plaintiff Charlotte Boswell filed a request for a status conference stating 14 that a dispute between plaintiff and her former attorneys Stephen Murphy and Jerry Clausen regarding 15 attorneys’ fees will be submitted to the State Bar’s Fee Arbitration Program, and that plaintiff’s 16 settlement of the punitive damages portion of the case has been paid. 17 Based upon these representations, the Court finds that a status conference is unnecessary. The 18 Ninth Circuit affirmed plaintiff Boswell’s compensatory damages award, and reversed and remanded 19 only with regard to the punitive damages award. Plaintiff Boswell’s punitive damages claim has now 20 been settled. Dismissals or judgments have been entered with regard to all other plaintiffs, and the 21 litigation in this Court regarding attorneys’ fees has been completed. Accordingly, the Court directs 22 plaintiff to file a dismissal of her claims, and once the dismissal is filed, the Clerk shall close this case. 23 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 26 27 28 Dated: February 22, 2012 SUSAN ILLSTON United States District Judge United States District Court For the Northern District of California 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?