Hopland Band of Pomo Indians v. Norton et al
Filing
78
ORDER DENYING ADMINSTRATIVE MOTION TO RELATE by Hon. William Alsup denying 75 Motion to Relate Case.(whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/22/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
HOPLAND BAND OF POMO INDIANS,
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
No. C 04-00102 WHA
Plaintiff,
v.
GALE NORTON, Secretary of the Interior,
DAVID ANDERSON, Assistant Secretary of
Indian Affairs, CLAY GREGORY, Acting
Regional Director, Pacific Regional Office, Bureau
of Indian Affairs, and DALE RISLING, SR.,
Superintendent of the Central California Agency of
Bureaus of Indian Affairs,
ORDER DENYING
ADMINISTRATIVE
MOTION TO RELATE
Defendants.
/
Plaintiffs have submitted an administrative motion seeking to relate recently-filed
20
Hopland v. Salazar to Hopland v. Norton, which was terminated in 2005. Defendants oppose.
21
Having reviewed the complaints, the order concludes the cases are not related within the
22
meaning of Civil Local Rule 3-12. The actions do not concern substantially the same parties.
23
The Norton action had one plaintiff, Hopland Band of Pomo Indians. The newly-filed Salazar
24
action names as plaintiffs Hopland Band of Pomo Indians along with four other federally
25
recognized Indian tribes. The allegations that give rise to the dispute in Salazar arose after
26
Norton ended, and concern different events, such as the tribes’ various requests to enter into
27
contracts with defendants for law enforcement services. The order finds no reason why
28
1
assignment of Salazar to a different judge would be an unduly burdensome duplication of labor
2
and expense. Therefore, the motion to relate is DENIED.
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6
Dated: March 22, 2012.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
7
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?