Merrifield et al v. Lockyer et al

Filing 172

JUDGMENT AND INJUNCTION. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on May 29, 2009. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/29/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ALAN MERRIFIELD, et al., Plaintiffs, v. BILL LOCKYER, et al., Defendants / No. 04-0498 MMC JUDGMENT AND INJUNCTION United States District Court On August 1, 2005, this Court granted defendants' motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment, and, on August 8, 2005, the Clerk entered judgment in favor of defendants. On October 17, 2008, the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reversed the judgment, with directions to enter a judgment in favor of plaintiffs; the mandate issued January 22, 2009.1 Accordingly, the Court hereby enters judgment in favor of plaintiffs and against defendants. Defendants are hereby permanently enjoined from enforcing against plaintiffs section 8555(g) of the California Business & Professions Code to the extent such section requires Branch 2 licensure for persons engaged in the live capture and removal or The Clerk of the District Court received the mandate on May 19, 2009. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 exclusion of mice, rats, or pigeons from a structure without the use of pesticides, provided those persons maintain insurance coverage as described in section 8692. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: May 29, 2009 MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?