Kahle et al v. Ashcroft
Filing
27
STIPULATION AND ORDER establishing briefing schedule and hearing date for defendant's motion to dismiss. Opposition is due 9/7/2004 and shall be limited to 40 pages. Reply is due 10/8/2004 and shall be limited to 30 pages. The hearing is continued from August 6, 2004 to October 29, 2004. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on 7/7/2004. (mmclc2, ) (Filed on 7/8/2004)
Kahle et al v. Ashcroft
Doc. 27
Case 3:04-cv-01127-MMC
Document 27
Filed 07/08/2004
Page 1 of 2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 KAHLE, ET AL. V. ASHCROFT CASE NO. 04-CV-1127MMC
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO HEADQUARTERS
BREWSTER KAHLE, INTERNET ARCHIVE, RICHARD PRELINGER, and PRELINGER ASSOCIATES, INC., Plaintiffs, v. JOHN ASHCROFT, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the United States, Defendant.
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Case No. 04-CV-1127 MMC
ORDER ESTABLISHING BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND HEARING DATE FOR DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS
The parties have filed a stipulation regarding the briefing schedule and hearing date for Defendant's motion to dismiss. Upon consideration of the stipulation, it is hereby
ORDERED that:
Plaintiffs shall file their brief opposing Defendant's motion on September 7, 2004. Plaintiff's brief shall be limited to 40 pages.
Defendant shall file its reply brief on October 8, 2004. Defendant's brief shall be limited to 30 pages.
Dockets.Justia.com
Case 3:04-cv-01127-MMC
Document 27
Filed 07/08/2004
Page 2 of 2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29
A hearing shall be held on Defendant's motion on October 29, 2004.
A case management conference shall be held on December 3, 2004.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Jul _ 7, ____ Dated:____y ___2004____
__________________________________ HONORABLE MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge
KAHLE, ET AL. V. ASHCROFT CASE NO. 04-CV-1127MMC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?