Kahle et al v. Ashcroft
Filing
33
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND CONDITIONALLY GRANTING IN PART
30 PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO ALLOW USE OF POWERPOINT SLIDES; CONTINUING HEARING ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on October 22, 2004. (mmcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/22/2004)
Kahle et al v. Ashcroft
Doc. 33
Case 3:04-cv-01127-MMC
Document 33
Filed 10/22/2004
Page 1 of 1
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
BREWSTER KAHLE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. JOHN ASHCROFT, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the United States, Defendant. /
No. C-04-1127 MMC ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND CONDITIONALLY GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO ALLOW USE OF POWERPOINT SLIDES; CONTINUING HEARING ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS (Docket No. 30)
United States District Court
11
For the Northern District of California
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Before the Court is plaintiffs' Motion to Allow Use of PowerPoint Slides in Hearing on Motion to Dismiss. Defendant's have filed opposition thereto. To the extent plaintiffs seek permission to bring computer and monitor equipment into the Federal Building, and, in particular, Courtroom 7, for use in arguing their opposition to defendant's motion to dismiss, the motion is hereby GRANTED. To the extent plaintiffs seek permission to make a PowerPoint presentation, the Court hereby GRANTS the motion conditioned on plaintiffs' providing defendant, on or before the date of the hearing, an opportunity to view the slides in advance of plaintiffs' presentation, and subject to any objection defendant may thereafter raise. Additionally, because the Court will be unavailable to hear the matter on October 29, 2004, the hearing is hereby CONTINUED to November 5, 2004 at 9:00 a.m. This order terminates Docket No. 30. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: October 22, 2004 /s/ Maxine M. Chesney MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge
Dockets.Justia.com
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?