Therasense, Inc. v. Becton, Dickinson and Company
REQUEST FOR INPUT. Signed by Judge Alsup on March 19, 2012.. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/19/2012)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
REQUEST FOR INPUT
BECTON, DICKINSON AND
AND CONSOLIDATED CASES.
No. C 04-02123 WHA
By NOON ON WEDNESDAY, each side shall please address whether there are any
contemporaneous memos, emails, or other documents in the trial record showing that
Dr. Sanghera and/or Attorney Pope had in mind at the time of the withholding the arguments now
made by Abbott to distinguish the EPO briefs. By contemporaneous, the Court means memos,
emails, or other documents prepared or extant at or before the allowance of the ’551 patent. Each
side can submit statements that do not exceed three pages doubled spaced without footnotes.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 19, 2012.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?