Therasense, Inc. v. Becton, Dickinson and Company

Filing 1137

REQUEST FOR INPUT. Signed by Judge Alsup on March 19, 2012.. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/19/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 9 THERASENSE, INC., 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 Plaintiff, v. REQUEST FOR INPUT BECTON, DICKINSON AND COMPANY, Defendant. / AND CONSOLIDATED CASES. / 16 17 No. C 04-02123 WHA By NOON ON WEDNESDAY, each side shall please address whether there are any 18 contemporaneous memos, emails, or other documents in the trial record showing that 19 Dr. Sanghera and/or Attorney Pope had in mind at the time of the withholding the arguments now 20 made by Abbott to distinguish the EPO briefs. By contemporaneous, the Court means memos, 21 emails, or other documents prepared or extant at or before the allowance of the ’551 patent. Each 22 side can submit statements that do not exceed three pages doubled spaced without footnotes. 23 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 26 27 28 Dated: March 19, 2012. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?