Charles O. Bradley Trust et al v. Zenith Capital LLC et al
ORDER re #379 MOTION to Enforce Judgment filed by Charles O. Bradley Trust. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 2/27/2009. (mejlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/27/2009)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3) 2) vs. ZENITH CAPITAL LLC, et al., Defendant. CHARLES O BRADLEY, et al., Plaintiff, No. C 04-2239 MEJ IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
ORDER RE: PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO ENFORCE SETTLEMENT
On February 26, 2009, the Court scheduled a hearing on Plaintiffs' Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement. (Dkt. #383.) However, upon review of Plaintiffs' motion, it appears that the relief sought therein might be in the form of a stipulated request, thereby obviating the need for further briefing and a hearing. Accordingly, the Court hereby ORDERS as follows: 1) If all parties are in agreement as to Plaintiffs' request to file and record a stipulated judgment in this matter, they shall file a stipulated request that the Court enter the judgment, along with proposed judgment. If the parties are not in agreement as to Plaintiffs' request but they agree that a further settlement conference might avoid the need for further briefing and a hearing, they shall file a joint request to appear for a further settlement conference before the undersigned magistrate judge. If the parties are not in agreement as to Plaintiffs' request, and they do not agree that a further settlement conference would be beneficial, they shall file a joint statement requesting that the Court proceed as scheduled in the February 26, 2009 Notice. The parties shall inform the Court of their decision by March 12, 2009 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: February 27, 2009 MARIA-ELENA JAMES United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?