Willis et al v. City of Oakland et al

Filing 146

ORDER that defendants file reply memorandum in support of their motion for summary judgment not later than 11/3/09 (vrwlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/19/2009)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 LILLIE WILLIS and LAVITA OLIVER, PlaintiffS, v CITY OF OAKLAND, a municipal corporation; OAKLAND POLICE DEPARTMENT; RICHARD WORD, in his capacity as Chief of Police for the CITY OF OAKLAND; CITY OF OAKLAND Police Officers FOUGHT and CLEMENT and DOES 6 through 10, inclusive, Defendants. / On June 4, 2009, defendants moved for summary judgment on all claims. Doc #138. Because plaintiffs did not file a timely No ORDER C-04-2305 VRW IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

response to the summary judgment motion, the court ordered plaintiffs to show cause why defendants' motion should not be granted. Doc #141. On July 21, 2009, plaintiffs filed an Doc #145.

opposition and attached supporting evidence.

Plaintiffs' opposition to defendants' motion, along with their supporting evidence, calls for a response from defendants.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Accordingly, defendants are hereby ORDERED to file a reply memorandum in support of their motion for summary judgment not later than November 3, 2009.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

VAUGHN R WALKER United States District Chief Judge

2