Willis et al v. City of Oakland et al
Filing
185
AMENDED ORDER SETTING PRELIMINARY PRETRIAL CONFERENCE. Preliminary Pretrial Conference set for 6/27/2011 11:00 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. James Ware. Signed by Judge James Ware on 6/9/11. (sis, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/9/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
NO. C 04-02305 JW
Lillie Willis, et al.
11
AMENDED ORDER SETTING
PRELIMINARY PRETRIAL
CONFERENCE
Plaintiffs,
v.
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
City of Oakland, et al.,
13
Defendants.
14
15
/
On May 20, 2011, Judge Larson issued a Minute Order indicating that this case was not
16
settled. (Docket Item No. 183.) In light of the age of the case and the parties’ inability to settle, the
17
Court now sets a Preliminary Pretrial Conference to advance this case. Thus, on June 27, 2011at 11
18
a.m., the parties shall appear for the Pretrial Conference. On or before June 17, 2011, the parties
19
shall file a Joint Preliminary Pretrial Statement. The Statement shall include an update on any
20
further settlement negotiations and a good faith proposed schedule for trial.
21
22
Failure to file a timely Pretrial Statement may result in appropriate sanctions. (See Docket
Item No. 181.)
23
24
25
26
27
28
Dated: June 9, 2011
JAMES WARE
United States District Chief Judge
1
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT COPIES OF THIS ORDER HAVE BEEN DELIVERED TO:
2
Christopher Andrew Kee ckee@oaklandcityattorney.org
Dennis Cunningham denniscunningham@juno.com
James F. Hodgkins jhodgkins@oaklandcityattorney.org
3
4
5
Dated: June 9, 2011
Richard W. Wieking, Clerk
6
By:
7
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
/s/ JW Chambers
Susan Imbriani
Courtroom Deputy
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?