Faith Center Church Evengelist Ministries et al v. Glover et al

Filing 37

First MOTION to Continue or Extend Deadline for Early Neutral Evaluation filed by Faith Center Church Evengelist Ministries. (Murray, Elizabeth) (Filed on 2/23/2005)

Faith Center Church Evengelist Ministries et al v. Glover et al

Doc. 37

Case 3:04-cv-03111-JSW

Document 37

Filed 02/23/2005

Page 1 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

BENJAMIN W. BULL Arizona State Bar No. 009940 JOSHUA W. CARDEN Arizona State Bar No. 021698 ELIZABETH A. MURRAY Arizona State Bar No. 022954 Alliance Defense Fund 15333 N. Pima Rd., Suite 165 Scottsdale, AZ 85260 Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone] ROBERT H. TYLER Alliance Defense Fund California State Bar No. 179572 38760 Sky Canyon Drive, Suite B Murietta, CA 92563 Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone] TERRY L. THOMPSON Law Offices of Terry L. Thompson California State Bar No. 199870 P.O. Box 1346 Alamo, CA 94507 Phone [phone] Fax: [phone] (designated local counsel) Attorneys for Plaintiffs IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FAITH CENTER CHURCH EVANGELISTIC MINISTRIES, et al., Plaintiffs, v. FEDERAL D. GLOVER, et al., Defendants.

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

No. C-04-3111 JSW PLAINTIFFS' UNOPPOSED MOTION TO EXTEND THE DEADLINE FOR EARLY NEUTRAL EVALUATION

1
Dockets.Justia.com

Case 3:04-cv-03111-JSW

Document 37

Filed 02/23/2005

Page 2 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Under ADR Local Rule 5-5, Plaintiffs, through their counsel, move for leave of Court to extend the deadline for conducting an Early Neutral Evaluation ("ENE") Session. The parties are currently scheduled for an ENE session on March 10, 2005. Because Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction is pending before this Court, the parties believe that ENE will not be beneficial to the parties until this Court rules on Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction as the decision will impact the parties' arguments at the ENE session. The parties respectfully request that an ENE session be held within 30 days after this Court's ruling on Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction. The parties concur in this request. For this reason, Plaintiffs respectfully request that the Court grant this unopposed motion to extend the deadline for ENE. Respectfully submitted this 23rd of February, 2005. By: /s/ Elizabeth A. Murray Attorney for Plaintiffs

2