Faith Center Church Evengelist Ministries et al v. Glover et al

Filing 68

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Federal D. Glover, Mark DeSaulnier, John M. Gioia, Millie Greenberg, Gayle B. Uilkema, John Sweeten, Anne Cain, Patty Chan, Laura O'Donahue re 65 Notice of Appeal 66 Notice (Other) (hdj, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/17/2005)

Download PDF
Faith Center Church Evengelist Ministries et al v. Glover et al Doc. 68 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 DAVID T. BIDERMAN, Bar No. 101577 JUDITH B. GITTERMAN, Bar No. 115661 M. CHRISTOPHER JHANG, Bar No. 211463 PERKINS COIE LLP 180 Townsend Street, 3rd Floor San Francisco, CA 94107-1909 Telephone: (415) 344-7000 Facsimile: (415) 344-7050 Email: DBiderman@perkinscoie.com Email: JGitterman@perkinscoie.com Email: CJhang@perkinscoie.com Attorneys for Defendant Google, Inc. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [Proposed] Order Granting Defendant Google, Inc.'s Motion to Enlarge Time and Clarify Court Order CASE NO. 05-03649 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION CLRB HANSON INDUSTRIES, LLC d/b/a INDUSTRIAL PRINTING, and HOWARD STERN, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. GOOGLE, INC., Defendant. CASE NO. C O5-03649 JW [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT GOOGLE, INC.'S MOTION TO ENLARGE TIME AND CLARIFY COURT ORDER [41063-0023/BY062060.132] Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Defendant Google, Inc.'s ("Google") Motion to Enlarge Time and Clarify Court Order is brought pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-3. The Court having considered all relevant documents and evidence, and good cause appearing therefore: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Enlarge Time and Clarify Court Order is granted. The August 6, 2006 deposition deadline set in the Court's Order Following Case Management Conference ("Order") is continued to September 8, 2006. Google is entitled to depose both plaintiffs in this action, and plaintiffs shall make themselves available for deposition on dates mutually agreed upon by the parties between August 14 to September 8, 2006. The October 6, 2006 partial summary judgment hearing date set in the Court's Order is continued to November 20, 2006. Dated: ____________________, 2006 ___________________________________ Honorable James Ware U.S.D.C., Northern District of California Respectfully submitted: PERKINS COIE LLP By ____________/S/______________ M. Christopher Jhang Attorneys for Defendant Google, Inc. -1[Proposed] Order Granting Defendant Google, Inc.'s Motion to Enlarge Time and Clarify Court Order CASE NO. 05-03649 [41063-0023/BY062060.132] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 I, Susan E. Daniels, declare: PROOF OF SERVICE I am a citizen of the United States and am employed in the County of San Francisco, State of California. I am over the age of 18 years and am not a party to the within action. My business address is Perkins Coie LLP, Four Embarcadero Center, Suite 2400, San Francisco, California 94111. I am personally familiar with the business practice of Perkins Coie LLP. On July 26, 2006, I served the following document(s): [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT GOOGLE, INC.'S MOTION TO ENLARGE TIME AND CLARIFY COURT ORDER by placing a true copy thereof enclosed in a sealed envelope addressed to the following parties: William M. Audet, Esq. Ryan M. Hagan, Esq. Jason Baker, Esq. ALEXANDER, HAWES & AUDET, LLP 152 North Third Street, Suite 600 San Jose, CA 95112 Tel: (408) 289-1776; Fax: (408) 287-1776 XXX (By Hand) I caused each envelope to be delivered by hand to the offices listed above. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the above is true and correct and that this declaration was executed at San Francisco, California. DATED: July 26, 2006 /S/ Susan E. Daniels -1[Proposed] Order Granting Defendant Google, Inc.'s Motion to Enlarge Time and Clarify Court Order CASE NO. 05-03649 [41063-0023/BY062060.132]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?