Cybersource Corporation v. Retail Decision, Inc. et al

Filing 193

STIPULATION AND ORDER re page limit for plaintiff's opposition to RED's invalidity 102, 103 motion; Signed by Judge Marilyn Hall Patel on 2/20/2009. (awb, COURT-STAFF) (Filed on 2/20/2009)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

KARL J. KRAMER (CA SBN 136433) kkramer@mo fo.com MARC J. PERNICK (CA SBN 160591) mpernick@mo fo.com SUSAN V. VAUGHAN (CA SBN 223576) svaughan@mo fo.com MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 755 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, California 94304-1018 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] J. RYAN GILFOIL (CA SBN 246493) jgilfo il@mo fo.com MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 425 Market Street San Francisco, California 94105-2482 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Plaintiff CYBERSOURCE CORPORATION

SCOTT J. BORNSTEIN (Pro Hac Vice) [e-mail] ALLAN A. KASSENOFF (Pro Hac Vice) kasseno ffa@gt law.com GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP MetLife Building New York, NY 10166 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] JAMES W. SOONG (SBN: 196092) soongj@gt law.co m GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP 1900 University Avenue, Fifth Floor East Palo Alto, California 94303 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Defendant RETAIL DECISIONS, INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

CYBERSOURCE CORPORATION, Plaint iff, v. RETAIL DECISIONS, INC., Defendant.

Case No.

3:04-CV-03268-MHP

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER REGARDING PAGE LIMIT FOR CYBERSOURCE'S OPPOSITION TO RED'S INVALIDITY (35 U.S.C. §§ 102, 103) MOTION

Subject to the Court's approval, Plaintiff CyberSource Corporation and Defendant Retail Decisions, Inc. (collectively, the "Parties"), by and through their respective attorneys, hereby stipulate that: 1. CyberSource's opposition to ReD's summary judgment motion on Sections

102/103 invalidity ("§§ 102/103 Motion") is due on February 23, 2009.

STIP. & PROPOSED ORDER RE CYBERSOURCE'S OPPOSITION TO RED'S §§ 102/103 INVALIDITY MOTION CASE NO. 3:04-CV-03268-MHP pa-1319947

1

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

2.

Under Local Rule 7-4(b), CyberSource's opposition is limited to 25 pages, unless

the Court expressly orders otherwise. 3. ReD has moved for summary judgment that CyberSource's patent is invalid as

anticipated and/or obvious over nine primary references and a number of additional secondary references. Pursuant to a stipulation and Court order of January 27, 2009, the Court extended the page limit for ReD's motion to 35 pages. 4. In light of the scope of ReD's motion and the length and format of its discussion,

CyberSource has requested and ReD has stipulated to extend the page limit for CyberSource's opposition from 25 pages to 45 pages. Dated: February 19, 2009 KARL J. KRAMER MARC J. PERNICK MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP By: /s/ Marc J. Pernick Marc J. Pernick MPernick@mo fo.com Attorneys for Plaintiff CYBERSOURCE CORPORATION Dated: February 19, 2009 SCOTT J. BORNSTEIN ALLAN A. KASSENOFF JAMES W. SOONG GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP By: /s/ Allan A. Kassenoff Allan A. Kassenoff kasseno ffa@gt law.com Attorneys for Defendant RETAIL DECISIONS, INC.

UNIT ED

S

S DISTRICT TE C PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. A T
2/20/2009 Dated: ________________

FO
2

_______________________________________ O ORD IT IS S HON. MARILYN HALL PATEL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE atel lyn H. P ge Mari Jud

ERED

STIP. & PROPOSED ORDER RE CYBERSOURCE'S OPPOSITION TO RED'S §§ 102/103 INVALIDITY MOTION ER CASE NO. 3:04-CV-03268-MHP C pa-1319947 N F

D IS T IC T O R

A

LI

R NIA

RT U O

NO

RT

H

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

I, MARC J. PERNICK, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER REGARDING PAGE LIMIT FOR CYBERSOURCE'S OPPOSITION TO RED'S INVALIDITY (35 U.S.C. §§ 102, 103) MOTION. In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that Allan A. Kassenoff has concurred in this filing. Dated: February 19, 2009 MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP By: /s/ Marc J. Pernick

STIP. & PROPOSED ORDER RE CYBERSOURCE'S OPPOSITION TO RED'S §§ 102/103 INVALIDITY MOTION CASE NO. 3:04-CV-03268-MHP pa-1319947

3