Ellis v. Costco Wholesale Corporation
Filing
907
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 906 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Granting Voluntary Dismissal of Plaintiff Elaine Sasaki's Claims filed by Elaine Sasaki. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 7/28/15. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/28/2015)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
THE IMPACT FUND
Jocelyn D. Larkin (SBN: 110817)
Robert Schug (SBN: 249640)
Meredith Johnson (SBN: 291018)
125 University Avenue, Suite 102
Berkeley, CA 94710
Telephone: (510) 845-3473
Facsimile: (510) 845-3654
jlarkin@impactfund.org
SEYFARTH SHAW LLP
Kenwood C. Youmans (SBN 68258)
David D. Kadue (SBN 113578)
2029 Century Park East, Suite 3500
Los Angeles, California 90067-2901
Telephone: (310) 201-5211
Facsimile: (310) 201-5219
dkadue@seyfarth.com
LEWIS, FEINBERG, LEE
& JACKSON, P.C.
Bill Lann Lee (SBN: 108452)
Lindsay Nako (SBN: 239090)
476 9th Street
Oakland, CA 94607
Telephone: (510) 839-6824
Facsimile: (510) 839-7839
blee@lewisfeinberg.com
SEYFARTH SHAW LLP
Gerald L. Maatman (admitted pro hac vice)
Annette Tyman (admitted pro hac vice)
131 South Dearborn Street
Chicago, Illinois 60603
Telephone: (312) 460-5965
Facsimile: (312) 460-7965
gmaatman@seyfarth.com
DAVIS, COWELL & BOWE, LLP
Steve Stemerman (SBN: 067690)
Elizabeth A. Lawrence (SBN: 111781)
595 Market Street, #1400
San Francisco, CA 94105
Telephone: (415) 597-7200
Facsimile: (415) 597-7201
eal@dcbsf.com
SEYFARTH SHAW LLP
David B. Ross (admitted pro hac vice)
620 8th Avenue
32nd Floor
New York, New York 10018
(212) 218-5500
dross@seyfarth.com
Attorneys for Plaintiffs and Certified Classes
Attorneys for Defendant Costco Wholesale Corp.
[Additional Counsel Listed on
Signature Page]
18
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
19
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
20
21
SHIRLEY "RAE" ELLIS, et al.,
Case No. C04-3341 EMC
22
Plaintiffs,
23
v.
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
GRANTING VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF
PLAINTIFF ELAINE SASAKI’S CLAIMS
24
COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION,
25
Defendant.
26
27
28
STIP AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING VOLUNTARY
DISMISSAL OF PLAINTIFF ELAINE SASAKI’S CLAIMS
CASE NO. C04-3341 EMC
20504207v.1
1
2
3
4
STIPULATION
The parties stipulate to the dismissal, with prejudice, of Plaintiff Elaine Sasaki’s claims,
pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
This stipulation does not affect the class action settlement, over which the Court retains
5
jurisdiction.
6
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
7
8
Dated: July 27, 2015
/s/ Jocelyn D. Larkin
9
10
Jocelyn D. Larkin
Impact Fund
11
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
12
Dated: July 27, 2015
13
/s/ David D. Kadue
14
David D. Kadue
Seyfarth Shaw LLP
15
Attorneys for Defendant
16
17
Additional Counsel for Plaintiffs
Additional Counsel for Defendant
18
LIEFF CABRASER HEIMANN &
BERNSTEIN, LLP
Kelly M. Dermody (SBN: 171716)
Daniel M. Hutchinson (SBN: 239458)
275 Battery Street, 29th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111-3339
Telephone: 415.956.1000
Facsimile: 415.956.1008
kdermody@lchb.com
dhutchinson@lchb.com
SEYFARTH SHAW LLP
Thomas J. Wybenga (admitted pro hac vice)
c/o Costco Wholesale Corporation
999 Lake Drive
Issaquah, WA 98027-5367
Telephone: (425) 313-6794
Facsimile: (425) 313-6922
twybenga@seyfarth.com
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-1-
20504207v.1
STIP AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING VOLUNTARY
DISMISSAL OF PLAINTIFF ELAINE SASAKI’S CLAIMS
CASE NO. C04-3341 EMC
1
2
3
4
5
[PROPOSED] ORDER
PURSUANT TO THE PARTIES’ STIPULATION AND GOOD CAUSE
APPEARING,
Plaintiff Elaine Sasaki’s claims are DISMISSED with prejudice. This stipulation does not
affect the class action settlement, over which the Court retains jurisdiction.
6
S
UNIT
ED
9
10
D
RDERE
OO
IT IS S
11
dwar
Judge E
LI
28
Dated: July ____ , 2015
RT
E R Honorable Edward M.CChen
N
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
OF
D
14
A
H
13
en
d M. Ch
NO
12
RT
U
O
8
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
R NIA
IT IS SO ORDERED.
FO
7
IS T RIC T
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
20504207v.1
STIP AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING VOLUNTARY
DISMISSAL OF PLAINTIFF ELAINE SASAKI’S CLAIMS
CASE NO. C04-3341 EMC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?