Ellis v. Costco Wholesale Corporation

Filing 907

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 906 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Granting Voluntary Dismissal of Plaintiff Elaine Sasaki's Claims filed by Elaine Sasaki. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 7/28/15. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/28/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 THE IMPACT FUND Jocelyn D. Larkin (SBN: 110817) Robert Schug (SBN: 249640) Meredith Johnson (SBN: 291018) 125 University Avenue, Suite 102 Berkeley, CA 94710 Telephone: (510) 845-3473 Facsimile: (510) 845-3654 jlarkin@impactfund.org SEYFARTH SHAW LLP Kenwood C. Youmans (SBN 68258) David D. Kadue (SBN 113578) 2029 Century Park East, Suite 3500 Los Angeles, California 90067-2901 Telephone: (310) 201-5211 Facsimile: (310) 201-5219 dkadue@seyfarth.com LEWIS, FEINBERG, LEE & JACKSON, P.C. Bill Lann Lee (SBN: 108452) Lindsay Nako (SBN: 239090) 476 9th Street Oakland, CA 94607 Telephone: (510) 839-6824 Facsimile: (510) 839-7839 blee@lewisfeinberg.com SEYFARTH SHAW LLP Gerald L. Maatman (admitted pro hac vice) Annette Tyman (admitted pro hac vice) 131 South Dearborn Street Chicago, Illinois 60603 Telephone: (312) 460-5965 Facsimile: (312) 460-7965 gmaatman@seyfarth.com DAVIS, COWELL & BOWE, LLP Steve Stemerman (SBN: 067690) Elizabeth A. Lawrence (SBN: 111781) 595 Market Street, #1400 San Francisco, CA 94105 Telephone: (415) 597-7200 Facsimile: (415) 597-7201 eal@dcbsf.com SEYFARTH SHAW LLP David B. Ross (admitted pro hac vice) 620 8th Avenue 32nd Floor New York, New York 10018 (212) 218-5500 dross@seyfarth.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs and Certified Classes Attorneys for Defendant Costco Wholesale Corp. [Additional Counsel Listed on Signature Page] 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 19 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 20 21 SHIRLEY "RAE" ELLIS, et al., Case No. C04-3341 EMC 22 Plaintiffs, 23 v. STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF PLAINTIFF ELAINE SASAKI’S CLAIMS 24 COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION, 25 Defendant. 26 27 28 STIP AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF PLAINTIFF ELAINE SASAKI’S CLAIMS CASE NO. C04-3341 EMC 20504207v.1 1 2 3 4 STIPULATION The parties stipulate to the dismissal, with prejudice, of Plaintiff Elaine Sasaki’s claims, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This stipulation does not affect the class action settlement, over which the Court retains 5 jurisdiction. 6 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 7 8 Dated: July 27, 2015 /s/ Jocelyn D. Larkin 9 10 Jocelyn D. Larkin Impact Fund 11 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 12 Dated: July 27, 2015 13 /s/ David D. Kadue 14 David D. Kadue Seyfarth Shaw LLP 15 Attorneys for Defendant 16 17 Additional Counsel for Plaintiffs Additional Counsel for Defendant 18 LIEFF CABRASER HEIMANN & BERNSTEIN, LLP Kelly M. Dermody (SBN: 171716) Daniel M. Hutchinson (SBN: 239458) 275 Battery Street, 29th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111-3339 Telephone: 415.956.1000 Facsimile: 415.956.1008 kdermody@lchb.com dhutchinson@lchb.com SEYFARTH SHAW LLP Thomas J. Wybenga (admitted pro hac vice) c/o Costco Wholesale Corporation 999 Lake Drive Issaquah, WA 98027-5367 Telephone: (425) 313-6794 Facsimile: (425) 313-6922 twybenga@seyfarth.com 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -1- 20504207v.1 STIP AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF PLAINTIFF ELAINE SASAKI’S CLAIMS CASE NO. C04-3341 EMC 1 2 3 4 5 [PROPOSED] ORDER PURSUANT TO THE PARTIES’ STIPULATION AND GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, Plaintiff Elaine Sasaki’s claims are DISMISSED with prejudice. This stipulation does not affect the class action settlement, over which the Court retains jurisdiction. 6 S UNIT ED 9 10 D RDERE OO IT IS S 11 dwar Judge E LI 28 Dated: July ____ , 2015 RT E R Honorable Edward M.CChen N UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT OF D 14 A H 13 en d M. Ch NO 12 RT U O 8 S DISTRICT TE C TA R NIA IT IS SO ORDERED. FO 7 IS T RIC T 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2- 20504207v.1 STIP AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF PLAINTIFF ELAINE SASAKI’S CLAIMS CASE NO. C04-3341 EMC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?