Shasta Strategic Investment Fund LLC et al v. United States of America

Filing 135

STIPULATION AND ORDER VACATING DEADLINES RELATING TO PRELIMINARY PRETRIAL CONFERENCE re (134 in 3:04-cv-04264-JW) STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re (133) Stipulation and Order. Signed by Chief Judge James Ware on June 22, 2012. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/22/2012)

Download PDF
R NIA S re mes Wa Judge Ja A H LI RT ER FO UNIT ED RT U O D RDERE OO IT IS S NO 1 JOHN A. DICICCO Deputy Assistant Attorney General 2 STUART D. GIBSON (MnSBN 34587) 3 Senior Litigation Counsel Stuart.D.Gibson@usdoj.gov 4 ADAIR F. BOROUGHS (TnSBN 026210) Trial Attorney 5 Adair.F.Boroughs@usdoj.gov Tax Division, U.S. Department of Justice 6 P.O. Box 403 Washington, DC 20044 7 Tel: (202) 307-6586 (Mr. Gibson) (202) 305-7546 (Ms. Boroughs) 8 Fax: (202) 307-2504 Attorneys for United States of America 9 ISTRIC ES D TC AT T N F D IS T IC T O R C 10 MELINDA L. HAAG (CaSBN 132612) United States Attorney 11 Northern District of California Of Counsel 12 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 16 17 18 19 20 21 SHASTA STRATEGIC INVESTMENT ) FUND, LLC; AND PRESIDIO GROWTH ) LLC (Tax Matters Partner), ) ) Petitioners, ) ) v. ) ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) 22 Respondent. 23 24 ) ) Case No. C-04-4264-JW Related to Case Nos. C-04-4309-JW, C-044398-JW, C-04-4399-JW, C-04-4964-JW, C05-1123-JW, C-05-2835-JW, and C-05-3887JW STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER VACATING DEADLINES RELATING TO PRELIMINARY PRETRIAL CONFERENCE ) Pursuant to Local Rule 6-2, the undersigned parties to these related actions hereby stipulate 25 26 and request that the Court remove from the calendar the filing of Preliminary Pretrial Conference 27 28 Stipulation and Proposed Order Case No. C-04-4264-JW 1 2 Statements, set for June 29, 2012, and the Preliminary Pretrial Conference, set for July 9, 2012. In support of this request, the parties submit the following: 3 1. According to the Order entered July 6, 2011, the parties must confer with one another, 4 5 and file and lodge by the deadline a Preliminary Pretrial and Trial Setting Conference Statement 6 stating their readiness for trial, the amount of time which the Court should allocate for trial and the 7 calendar period for the trial. Among other things, the purpose of the Preliminary Pretrial and Trial 8 Setting Conference is to set a time for trial, and establish time parameters for the parties’ 9 10 11 presentations at trial. 2. By Order entered March 12, 2012, the Court established June 29, 2012 as the deadline 12 for filing the Preliminary Pretrial and Trial Setting Conference Statement, and July 9, 2012 as the 13 date for the Preliminary Pretrial and Trial Setting Conference. In that same order, among other 14 deadlines, the Court established August 13, 2012 as the discovery deadline, and set October 15, 2012 15 16 17 as the last day to hear dispositive motions. 3. On April 28, 2012 the Court announced the retirement of Chief Judge Ware, to be 18 effective in August, 2012. The Court has since announced that Chief Judge Ware will conduct his 19 final Civil Law and Motion calendar on June 25, 2012. 20 4. Because Chief Judge Ware will retire before the trial of these cases, the parties 21 22 23 24 25 believe that it would be more efficient to address pretrial and trial scheduling issues after the cases have been assigned to a new judge. 5. The parties do not seek any other modification or extension of the schedule established in the March 12, 2012 Order. 26 27 28 -2- Stipulation and Proposed Order Case No. C-04-4264-JW 1 2 Previous Time Modifications 6. The Court previously granted stipulated requests to extend time to file answers in 3 some of these related cases. Shasta, Case No. 04-4264, Docket Nos. 13, 18; Belford, Case No. 044 5 4309, Docket Nos. 8, 11; Sanford, Case No. 04-4398,Docket Nos. 9, 12; Olympus, Case No. 04- 6 4399, Docket Nos. 9, 13; Sill, Case No. 04-4964, Docket Nos. 10, 13. 7 8 7. The Court previously granted Petitioners’ Motion to Shorten Time to Hear Motion to Compel Rule 30(b)(6) Deposition. Docket No. 48. 9 10 8. The Court previously granted Respondent’s Motion to Stay these related cases on 11 November 7, 2005, to avoid conflict with parallel criminal proceedings (Docket No. 95), and 12 extended that stay on October 2, 2006. Docket No. 103. After completion of the criminal 13 proceedings, the Court lifted the stay by Order of June 9, 2011. Docket No. 124. 14 9. The Court has previously granted two stipulated requests (first from respondent and 15 16 second from intervenors Tom Gonzales and Birch Ventures LLC) to extend the schedule. The first 17 was granted on September 28, 2011 (Docket No. 130), and the second was granted on March 12, 18 2012 (Docket No. 133). 19 Effect on the Schedule for the Case 20 10. The requested relief would not extend the schedule, but would merely reflect the 21 22 impact of Chief Judge Ware’s retirement on any trial setting. 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3- Stipulation and Proposed Order Case No. C-04-4264-JW 1 2 NOW THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED AND STIPULATED by the parties, subject to Order of the Court, that the date for filing the Preliminary Pretrial and Trial Setting Conference Statement 3 and Proposed Order, and the date for the Preliminary Pretrial and Trial Setting Conference, are 4 5 VACATED, pending the reassignment of these cases to a successor judge. 6 7 8 9 10 Dated: June 19, 2012 Respectfully submitted /s/ Steven M. Bauer STEVEN M. BAUER Latham & Watkins Attorney for Petitioners /s/ Stuart D. Gibson STUART D. GIBSON Senior Litigation Counsel Tax Division, Department of Justice Attorney for Respondent /s/ Willam E. Taggart, Jr. WILLIAM E. TAGGART, JR. Attorney for Intervenors Adkison and Salmon Ventures /s/ Martin A. Schainbaum MARTIN A. SCHAINBAUM Attorney for Intervenors Tom Gonzales and Birch Ventures LLC 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: June 22, 2012 ____________________________ James Ware United States District Judge 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -4- Stipulation and Proposed Order Case No. C-04-4264-JW

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?