Cherry et al v. The City College of San Francisco et al

Filing 845

ORDER REGARDING EXTENSION OF FINAL COMPLIANCE DEADLINE. Signed by Judge Alsup on January 8, 2010. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/8/2010)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 MARGIE CHERRY and ESTORIA CHERRY, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. THE CITY COLLEGE OF SAN FRANCISCO, et al., Defendants. / No. C 04-04981 WHA CLASS ACTION ORDER REGARDING EXTENSION OF FINAL COMPLIANCE DEADLINE IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 The undersigned has received the jointly filed letter from the parties seeking leave to file a joint stipulation in lieu of a motion by defendants to modify the amended stipulated judgment. The sole modification requested is an extension of the final compliance date from April 1, 2010, to October 11, 2010. In a class settlement, however, the judge plays an important and necessary role in ensuring that the terms of the settlement are in the best interests of absent class members. The parties, therefore, may not simply stipulate to an extension of compliance deadlines as requested in their letter. If an extension of the compliance deadline is required, a motion must be filed by January 14, 2010, under the schedule previously set forth by the undersigned (Dkt. No. 842). Class counsel, of course, may file a statement of non-opposition if they do not oppose the motion. At 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 that point, the Court will consider whether the circumstances justify such a lengthy extension, and whether the amended stipulated judgment should be modified. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 8, 2010. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?