Rodriguez v. County of Alameda
ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF'S LETTER FILED APRIL 4, 2012; DENYING RECONSIDERATION OF ORDER DENYING RECONSIDERATION OF ORDER DISMISSING ACTION. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on April 19, 2012. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/19/2012) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/19/2012: # 1 Certificate of Service) (tlS, COURT STAFF).
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
ALVARO C. RODRIGUEZ,
No. C-04-5196 MMC
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF’S LETTER
FILED APRIL 4, 2012; DENYING
RECONSIDERATION OF ORDER
DENYING RECONSIDERATION OF
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION
COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, et al.,
By order filed February 23, 2005, the Court dismissed the above-titled action,
without prejudice to plaintiff’s refiling his claims in a new complaint, in the event plaintiff’s
1993 conviction eventually were overturned or otherwise invalidated; that same date, the
Clerk of the Court entered judgment on the Court’s order of dismissal. By order filed March
29, 2012, the Court denied plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration of the Court’s February 23,
2005 order and the judgment entered thereon.
The Court is now in receipt of a letter from plaintiff, filed April 4, 2012, which letter
includes the title “Judgment or Order issued on March 29, 2012 is Void Ab initio.” The
Court construes the letter as a motion for reconsideration of the Court’s March 29, 2012
order. So construed, the motion is hereby DENIED, as plaintiff has failed to show any
cognizable basis for reconsideration exists. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: April 19, 2012
MAXINE M. CHESNEY
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?