Rodriguez v. County of Alameda

Filing 28

ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF'S LETTER FILED APRIL 4, 2012; DENYING RECONSIDERATION OF ORDER DENYING RECONSIDERATION OF ORDER DISMISSING ACTION. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on April 19, 2012. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/19/2012) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/19/2012: # 1 Certificate of Service) (tlS, COURT STAFF).

1
2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
ALVARO C. RODRIGUEZ,

No. C-04-5196 MMC

For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10
Plaintiff,

ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF’S LETTER
FILED APRIL 4, 2012; DENYING
RECONSIDERATION OF ORDER
DENYING RECONSIDERATION OF
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION

11
v.
12
COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, et al.,
13
Defendants
14

/

15
By order filed February 23, 2005, the Court dismissed the above-titled action,
16
without prejudice to plaintiff’s refiling his claims in a new complaint, in the event plaintiff’s
17
1993 conviction eventually were overturned or otherwise invalidated; that same date, the
18
Clerk of the Court entered judgment on the Court’s order of dismissal. By order filed March
19
29, 2012, the Court denied plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration of the Court’s February 23,
20
2005 order and the judgment entered thereon.
21
The Court is now in receipt of a letter from plaintiff, filed April 4, 2012, which letter
22
includes the title “Judgment or Order issued on March 29, 2012 is Void Ab initio.” The
23
Court construes the letter as a motion for reconsideration of the Court’s March 29, 2012
24
order. So construed, the motion is hereby DENIED, as plaintiff has failed to show any
25
cognizable basis for reconsideration exists. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b).
26
IT IS SO ORDERED.
27
28

Dated: April 19, 2012

MAXINE M. CHESNEY
United States District Judge